Constitutive modeling of Ni–Mn–Ga ferromagnetic shape memory alloys under biaxial compression
Source abstract
Abstract
Ferromagnetic shape memory alloys are a type of shape memory alloys that exhibit inelastic strains when subjected to magnetic fields. So far, several constitutive models have been proposed to predict ferromagnetic shape memory alloys’ behaviors under the application of a magnetic field and a compressive stress. In this article, an available constitutive model in a continuum framework is used to investigate the behaviors of Ni–Mn–Ga under biaxial compressive stresses. Since the required model parameters in the original approach are not unique for all loading conditions, the model is modified so that a unique set of model parameters suffices to study different loading conditions. Loading history is also considered in an improved way, and two-dimensional phase diagram is generalized to three-dimensional phase diagram, called reorientation surface in this work, to directly enter the effects of loading history on reorientation start conditions. The orthogonality property of a surface and its gradient vector are used to obtain the general conditions which must be satisfied to ensure continuation of reorientations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adem.20140001010.1002/adem.201400010 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.03.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2014.03.008 ↗
3. 10.1177/1045389X930040021310.1177/1045389X9300400213 ↗
4. 10.1177/1045389X960070011210.1177/1045389X9600700112 ↗
5. Chen X (2013) Magneto-mechanical behaviors of ferromagnetic shape memory alloys. PhD Thesis, École Polytechnique, Palaiseau.
6. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.738-739.42110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.738-739.421 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.08.10710.1016/j.matlet.2012.08.107 ↗
8. 10.1007/BF0126269010.1007/BF01262690 ↗
9. Couch RN · 2006
10. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/1/S0210.1088/0964-1726/16/1/S02 ↗
11. 10.1177/1045389X0606793010.1177/1045389X06067930 ↗
12. Guo Z · Advances in Condensed Matter Physics · 2014 · 295436
13. 10.1063/1.363636610.1063/1.3636366 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.473971110.1063/1.4739711 ↗
15. 10.1002/pssc.20040547910.1002/pssc.200405479 ↗
16. 10.3233/JAE-2004-61110.3233/JAE-2004-611 ↗
17. 10.1051/jp4:2003104410.1051/jp4:20031044 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00773-410.1016/S0304-8853(02)00773-4 ↗
19. Kiefer B · 2006
20. 10.1080/1478643050036385810.1080/14786430500363858 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.11.18410.1016/j.msea.2006.11.184 ↗
22. 10.1177/1045389X0708668810.1177/1045389X07086688 ↗
23. Lagoudas DC · 2008
24. 10.1115/1.402648310.1115/1.4026483 ↗
25. Lei H · Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures · 2013
26. 10.1002/978111857777610.1002/9781118577776 ↗
27. 10.1177/1045389X900010020510.1177/1045389X9000100205 ↗
28. Sarawate NN · 2008
29. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/3/03500110.1088/0964-1726/19/3/035001 ↗
30. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/12/12500810.1088/0964-1726/23/12/125008 ↗
31. 10.1177/1045389X1452170410.1177/1045389X14521704 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.11763710.1063/1.117637 ↗
33. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/9/09401510.1088/0964-1726/21/9/094015 ↗
34. 10.1007/s00161-013-0319-410.1007/s00161-013-0319-4 ↗
35. 10.1080/14786435.2010.54752710.1080/14786435.2010.547527 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.05.00110.1016/j.mechmat.2007.05.001 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.05.03210.1016/j.jallcom.2007.05.032 ↗