Bioinspired passive variable recruitment of fluidic artificial muscles
Source abstract
Abstract
This article presents a novel, passive approach to creating variable actuator recruitment in bundles of fluidic artificial muscles. The passive recruitment control approach is inspired by the functionality of mammalian muscle tissues, in which a single activation signal from the nervous system sequentially triggers contraction of progressively larger actuation elements until the required force is generated. Biologically, this behavior is encoded by differences in electrical resistance properties between smaller and larger muscle-fiber groups. The approach presented here produces analogous behavior using a uniform applied pressure to all fluidic artificial muscles while creating differential pressure responses and threshold pressures among the fluidic artificial muscles via tailored bladder elasticity parameters. A model for using elastic bladder stiffness to control an artificial muscle bundle with a single valve is explored and used to compare a bundle of fluidic artificial muscles with both low and high threshold pressure units to a single fluidic artificial muscle of equivalent displacement and force capability. The results of this analysis indicate the efficacy of using this control method; it is advantageous in cases where a wide range of displacements and forces are necessary and can increase efficiency when the system primarily operates in a low-force regime but requires occasional bursts of high-force capability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Soft Robotics and Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0966-6362(00)00099-010.1016/S0966-6362(00)00099-0 ↗
2. Anonymous · Los Angeles Times · 1958 · B8
3. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.03610.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.036 ↗
4. 10.1109/TIE.2013.228721710.1109/TIE.2013.2287217 ↗
5. 10.1115/1.403332510.1115/1.4033325 ↗
6. Biewener AA (2003) Animal Locomotion. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://www2.lib.ncsu.edu/catalog/record/UNCb4366719
7. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/7/07400910.1088/0964-1726/23/7/074009 ↗
8. 10.1088/1748-3190/aa7eb010.1088/1748-3190/aa7eb0 ↗
9. 10.1109/ROBOT.1994.35097710.1109/ROBOT.1994.350977 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2008.00549.x10.1111/j.1525-1594.2008.00549.x ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.01810.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.018 ↗
12. 10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.59910.1152/jn.1965.28.3.599 ↗
13. 10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.56010.1152/jn.1965.28.3.560 ↗
14. Jenkins TE · 2016
15. 10.1002/jor.110008031010.1002/jor.1100080310 ↗
16. 10.1016/0021-9290(94)00185-710.1016/0021-9290(94)00185-7 ↗
17. 10.1088/1748-3190/11/6/06500410.1088/1748-3190/11/6/065004 ↗
18. 10.1177/1045389X1454987210.1177/1045389X14549872 ↗
19. 10.1109/ROBOT.1997.61906010.1109/ROBOT.1997.619060 ↗
20. 10.1088/1748-3190/10/5/05500610.1088/1748-3190/10/5/055006 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.09.01010.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.09.010 ↗
22. 10.1109/TMECH.2014.234166010.1109/TMECH.2014.2341660 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ergon.2004.07.00210.1016/j.ergon.2004.07.002 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.sna.2015.08.02510.1016/j.sna.2015.08.025 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.01.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2006.01.002 ↗
26. 10.1177/1045389X1243862710.1177/1045389X12438627 ↗
27. 10.1177/1045389X1143543510.1177/1045389X11435435 ↗
28. 10.1088/1361-6439/aa9d1210.1088/1361-6439/aa9d12 ↗
29. 10.1108/0143991971019256310.1108/01439919710192563 ↗
30. Tondu B · 2000 · 20
31. 10.1177/1045389X1453343010.1177/1045389X14533430 ↗
32. 10.1080/01691864.2016.115480110.1080/01691864.2016.1154801 ↗
33. Zajac FE · Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · 1989 · 17 · 359
34. 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00069-310.1016/S0966-6362(02)00069-3 ↗
35. 10.1177/1045389X1142059210.1177/1045389X11420592 ↗