Electrorheology Improves E85 Engine Efficiency and Performance
Source abstract
Abstract
E85 is an alternative fuel with 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline. However, it is widely reported that E85 vehicles have difficulties to start in winter and have poor performance. Here, the authors report that with proper application of electrorheology, the authors can solve these issues. E85 vehicles all have port-injected engines. The fuel is injected into cylinders as droplets. Before the ignition, the fuel evaporates. Because E85 is more viscous than gasoline, the injected E85 droplet size is not small. Especially, in winter the cold weather makes the viscosity even higher, leading to the E85 droplets being even bigger. Since evaporation starts from the droplet surfaces, large droplets are difficult to be evaporated before the ignition comes. When there are no enough fuel vapors, the engine cannot start. To solve this problem, the authors introduce a small device just before the fuel injection, which produces a strong electric field to reduce the fuel viscosity, leading to much smaller fuel droplets in atomization. The evaporation is much faster and the engine is easier to start. As the small fuel droplets produced by our device make the combustion fast and timely, engine efficiency and performance are also expected to be improved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Heat transfer and supercritical fluids
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
References (11)
Show source-provided references
1. ARB (California Air Resources Board). 1989. Definition of a Low Emission Motor Vehicle in Compliance with the Mandates of Health and Safety Code Section 39037.05, http://www.arb.ca.gov/homepage.htm (accessed date August 1, 2010).
2. Jones T.T.M. 2008. The Clean Fuels Report: A Quantitative Comparison Of Motor Fuels, Related Pollution and Technologies, http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/ (accessed date August 1, 2010).
3. Larson R.G. 1999. The Structure and Rheology of Complex Fluids, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 263–323.
4. Lefebevre A.H. 1989. Atomization and Spray, Hemisphere Publishing, New York, NY, 27–78.
5. 10.4271/90071010.4271/900710 ↗
6. 10.1016/0095-8522(61)90058-710.1016/0095-8522(61)90058-7 ↗
7. 10.1142/S021797920704564510.1142/S0217979207045645 ↗
8. 10.1021/ef800489810.1021/ef8004898 ↗
9. 10.1021/ef900193z10.1021/ef900193z ↗
10. 10.1021/ef060072x10.1021/ef060072x ↗
11. 10.1016/0095-8522(65)90016-410.1016/0095-8522(65)90016-4 ↗