journal article·2018-11

Design optimization of a novel elastomeric baffle magnetorheological fluid device

Christopher M Elliott, Gregory D Buckner

Publisher page

Abstract

This article details the design optimization of a novel magnetorheological fluid device, which incorporates a rolling elastomeric baffle to contain the fluid and minimize cost and complexity. The application considered here is an electronic joystick for a drive-by-wire construction machine, although designs for other semi-active applications could be similarly optimized. Performance is evaluated computationally and experimentally. A computationally efficient system model is developed and validated using finite element analysis to accurately predict the device’s magnetic flux characteristics. The design methodology is based on a variant of the firefly algorithm, which identifies promising initial designs, and conjugate gradient methods, which optimize these designs. A unique graphical method for interpreting the results of population-based firefly optimization is demonstrated. An experimental prototype, based on the optimized design, is tested and its data compared to simulation results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Elevator Systems and Control · Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1117/12.60025510.1117/12.600255 ↗
2. 10.1007/s12239-011-0105-x10.1007/s12239-011-0105-x ↗
3. ASTM International · 2014
4. 10.1106/CG4J-V704-9LPH-GEC010.1106/CG4J-V704-9LPH-GEC0 ↗
5. Carlson JD, Koester SP (2001) Magnetically-controllable, active haptic interface system and apparatus. US 6283859 B1 Patent.
6. Catanzarite DM (1997) Controllable seat damper system and control method therefore. US 5652704A Patent.
7. 10.1016/j.jsv.2011.05.03610.1016/j.jsv.2011.05.036 ↗
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/10/10502710.1088/0964-1726/20/10/105027 ↗
9. Fitzgerald AE · 2003
10. 10.1007/978-3-319-13233-410.1007/978-3-319-13233-4 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.sna.2008.07.02810.1016/j.sna.2008.07.028 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/3/03502310.1088/0964-1726/19/3/035023 ↗
13. 10.1177/1045389X0607164710.1177/1045389X06071647 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.04210.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.042 ↗
15. 10.1177/1045389X990100010210.1177/1045389X9901000102 ↗
16. Meeker DC (2013) Finite element method magnetics, version 4.2. Available at: http://www.femm.info (accessed 2015).
17. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/12/12500310.1088/0964-1726/20/12/125003 ↗
18. 10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5_1010.1007/978-0-387-40065-5_10 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.01.03510.1016/j.compstruc.2007.01.035 ↗
20. 10.1115/1.402471910.1115/1.4024719 ↗
21. Rabinow J (1951) Magnetic fluid torque and force transmissing device. US 2575360 Patent.
22. Rabinow J (1954) Magnetic fluid shock absorber. US 2667237 Patent.
23. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/6/00410.1088/0964-1726/13/6/004 ↗
24. Simon D · 2013
25. 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00097-910.1016/S0141-0296(01)00097-9 ↗