New insights into the mechanical pre-stressing of piezotransducers
Source abstract
Abstract
Although pre-stressing is a requirement for the operation of a high-power piezo transducers, its impact on the model, the performance and the design of such devices is still not yet fully covered in the literature. This work attempts to bridge this gap by analyzing how the components of the Butterworth-Van Dyke model, the resonances, electrical impedances, electromechanical coupling factor, mechanical losses, and the tuning inductance are determined as a function of mechanical pre-stress. We have employed the Butterworth Van-Dyke model to study piezoelectric transducers tightened with a range of pre-stressing levels (12.2–60.1 MPa). As expected, the experimental results indicate that the components of the Butterworth-Van Dyke model are dependent upon the mechanical pre-stressing. The conclusions point out that, under mechanical pre-stressing levels between a threshold value and 60.1 MPa, the transducers used in this work tend to stabilize and enhance their performances. Also, upon stabilization, the transducers can be tuned with a constant inductance, which may also aid the design of ultrasonic systems. Overall, this work contributes to the definition of pre-stressing levels and its relationship with the length of the transducer, the mechanical losses, and the tuning.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Campinas, Limeira, SP, Brazil
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1143/JJAP.37.298210.1143/JJAP.37.2982 ↗
2. 10.1121/1.42670410.1121/1.426704 ↗
3. 10.1109/58.85208710.1109/58.852087 ↗
4. 10.1088/0022-3727/27/1/02310.1088/0022-3727/27/1/023 ↗
5. ANSI/IEEE 176 (1987) Standard on piezoelectricity.
6. 10.1109/58.91174610.1109/58.911746 ↗
7. 10.1121/1.293490610.1121/1.2934906 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0041-624X(00)00047-010.1016/S0041-624X(00)00047-0 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0041-624X(00)00048-210.1016/S0041-624X(00)00048-2 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0041-624X(03)00096-910.1016/S0041-624X(03)00096-9 ↗
11. 10.1080/00150193.2016.123999910.1080/00150193.2016.1239999 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.phpro.2015.03.01910.1016/j.phpro.2015.03.019 ↗
13. 10.1109/58.94973210.1109/58.949732 ↗
14. Barzegar A · IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control · 2004 · 51 · 262
15. 10.1016/B978-1-4832-2857-0.50009-510.1016/B978-1-4832-2857-0.50009-5 ↗
16. 10.1121/1.41362210.1121/1.413622 ↗
17. 10.1016/0041-624X(88)90055-810.1016/0041-624X(88)90055-8 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.phpro.2015.03.00310.1016/j.phpro.2015.03.003 ↗
19. Fu B · 2005
20. Fu B, Li T (2009) Model-based diagnosis for pre-stress of Langevin transducers. In: IEEE circuits and systems international conference, Chengdu, 28–29 April. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4960840 (accessed 10 December 2019).
21. 10.1088/0022-3735/22/10/00110.1088/0022-3735/22/10/001 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.sna.2007.10.01310.1016/j.sna.2007.10.013 ↗
23. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.24-25.6510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.24-25.65 ↗
24. 10.1109/T-SU.1967.2940510.1109/T-SU.1967.29405 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.11.00910.1016/j.apacoust.2016.11.009 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.07.00110.1016/j.ultras.2013.07.001 ↗
27. 10.1109/58.65518810.1109/58.655188 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mser.2015.01.00210.1016/j.mser.2015.01.002 ↗
29. Mason W · 1948
30. Neppiras E · 1973 · 295
31. 10.3390/ma902007110.3390/ma9020071 ↗
32. Qiao J · 2010 · 893
33. Queiróz R · 2005 · 468
34. 10.1016/0041-624X(85)90023-X10.1016/0041-624X(85)90023-X ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.07.00810.1016/j.ultras.2004.07.008 ↗
36. 10.1121/1.191841710.1121/1.1918417 ↗
37. 10.1109/58.89614410.1109/58.896144 ↗
38. Van Randeraat S · 1974
39. Vijaya M · 2013
40. 10.1121/1.505744310.1121/1.5057443 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00378-510.1016/S0041-624X(02)00378-5 ↗