journal article·2018-09

Compliant orthoses for repositioning of knee joint based on super-elasticity of shape memory alloys

Farshid Sadeghian, Mohammad Reza Zakerzadeh, Morad Karimpour, Mostafa Baghani

Publisher page

Abstract

People suffering from neuromuscular diseases may also face certain abnormalities in their walking pattern. Patients with quadriceps muscle weakness suffer from flexion contracture as well as flexion instability during the gait cycle. In this article, a knee-ankle-foot orthosis design is proposed with two different mechanisms for the stance and swing phases, addressing the needs of patients with quadriceps muscle weakness. The stance phase mechanism locks the knee joint movement from the initial contact until the end of mid-swing and after mid-stance phase, the knee joint can flex freely. OpenSim was utilized to simulate patients with muscle weakness as well as calculating the required moment to mimic the stiffness of a normal knee joint. The super-elasticity of shape memory alloys was then used to reproduce the calculated moment for different levels of muscle weakness. It is shown that by designing patient-specific orthosis, the stiffness profile of normal joint for each patient with distinct level of muscle weakness can be reproduced.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Andani MT · 2013
2. 10.1007/s11665-014-1079-410.1007/s11665-014-1079-4 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.12.02110.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.12.021 ↗
4. Bhadane-Deshpande M · 2012
5. Bowker P · 1993
6. 10.1177/1045389X960070011210.1177/1045389X9600700112 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02173-210.1016/S0166-2236(02)02173-2 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.04.00110.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.04.001 ↗
9. Deberg L · 2012
10. 10.1155/2014/57209410.1155/2014/572094 ↗
11. 10.1109/TBME.2007.90102410.1109/TBME.2007.901024 ↗
12. 10.1177/1045389X980090050510.1177/1045389X9800900505 ↗
13. Kirkup J (2007) A History of Limb Amputation. London: Springer, 199 pp.
14. 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00060-710.1016/S0966-6362(02)00060-7 ↗
15. 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.562725510.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627255 ↗
16. 10.1177/1045389X1454414510.1177/1045389X14544145 ↗
17. Nielsen C (2002) Issues affecting the future demand for orthotists and prosthetists: update 2002. A study prepared for the National Commission on Orthotic and Prosthetic Education, May. Available at: http://www.ncope.org/summit/pdf/Footnote3.pdf
18. 10.5772/5020110.5772/50201 ↗
19. 10.3390/jfb602032810.3390/jfb6020328 ↗
20. 10.1177/1045389X1351218710.1177/1045389X13512187 ↗
21. 10.3109/0309364040916792810.3109/03093640409167928 ↗
22. 10.1186/1743-0003-6-2310.1186/1743-0003-6-23 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.scient.2012.01.00510.1016/j.scient.2012.01.005 ↗
24. 10.1177/030936461454652410.1177/0309364614546524 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11665-011-9858-710.1007/s11665-011-9858-7 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.01010.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.010 ↗
27. Tian F · 2015
28. 10.1115/SMASIS2013-304410.1115/SMASIS2013-3044 ↗
29. 10.1115/IMECE2014-4043110.1115/IMECE2014-40431 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10439-014-1217-z10.1007/s10439-014-1217-z ↗
31. Vaughan CL · 1992
32. Yates G · Orthopaedics · 1968 · 1 · 153