journal article·2013-07

Increasing the power of piezoelectric energy harvesters by magnetic stiffening

Waleed Al-Ashtari, Matthias Hunstig, Tobias Hemsel, Walter Sextro

Publisher page

Abstract

A piezoelectric cantilever beam with a tip mass at its free end is a common energy harvester configuration. This article introduces a new principle of designing such a harvester that increases the generated power without changing the resonance frequency of the harvester: the attraction force between two permanent magnets is used to add stiffness to the system. This magnetic stiffening counters the effect of the tip mass on the efficient operation frequency. Five set-ups incorporating piezoelectric bimorph cantilevers of the same type in different mechanical configurations are compared theoretically and experimentally to investigate the feasibility of this principle: theoretical and experimental results show that magnetically stiffened harvesters have important advantages over conventional set-ups with and without tip mass. They generate more power while only slightly increasing the deflection in the piezoelectric harvester and they can be tuned across a wide range of excitation frequencies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechatronics and Dynamics, University of Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/1045389X1143074210.1177/1045389X11430742 ↗
2. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/3/03501910.1088/0964-1726/21/3/035019 ↗
3. 10.1177/1045389X0605753310.1177/1045389X06057533 ↗
4. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/2/02500410.1088/0964-1726/20/2/025004 ↗
5. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/01/01503510.1088/0964-1726/17/01/015035 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2006.03.00310.1016/j.mechatronics.2006.03.003 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.08060110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.080601 ↗
8. Dicken J · 2009
9. 10.1080/1058458059096457410.1080/10584580590964574 ↗
10. 10.1177/1045389X0708563910.1177/1045389X07085639 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jsv.2011.06.02110.1016/j.jsv.2011.06.021 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/4/04502310.1088/0964-1726/19/4/045023 ↗
13. 10.1080/1058458070175664910.1080/10584580701756649 ↗
14. 10.1117/12.77631410.1117/12.776314 ↗
15. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/1/00710.1088/0964-1726/13/1/007 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.nancom.2011.09.00110.1016/j.nancom.2011.09.001 ↗
17. 10.1109/TPEL.2002.80219410.1109/TPEL.2002.802194 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10832-007-9043-410.1007/s10832-007-9043-4 ↗
19. 10.1109/JSSC.2009.203444210.1109/JSSC.2009.2034442 ↗
20. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/12/12500610.1088/0964-1726/20/12/125006 ↗
21. Richter B (2010) Modellbasierter Entwurf resonant betriebener, piezoelektrischer Biege Schwinger in Energy Harvesting Generatoren. PhD Thesis, University of Paderborn, Germany. Aachen: Shaker.
22. Richter B · 2006
23. 10.1177/1045389X0505404210.1177/1045389X05054042 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0140-3664(02)00248-710.1016/S0140-3664(02)00248-7 ↗
25. 10.1109/ULTSYM.2008.025310.1109/ULTSYM.2008.0253 ↗
26. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/6/00110.1088/0964-1726/15/6/001 ↗
27. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2004.00120.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2004.00120.x ↗
28. 10.1016/j.physd.2010.01.01910.1016/j.physd.2010.01.019 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10832-007-9168-510.1007/s10832-007-9168-5 ↗
30. 10.1016/0924-4247(96)80118-X10.1016/0924-4247(96)80118-X ↗
31. 10.1007/978-1-4419-7566-9_110.1007/978-1-4419-7566-9_1 ↗
32. Zhu D · 2008 · 229
33. 10.1016/j.sna.2010.01.00210.1016/j.sna.2010.01.002 ↗