Compression Deformation Behavior and Processing Map of Pure Copper
Source abstract
Abstract
To reveal the compression deformation behavior of pure copper, the deformation characteristics of pure copper have been investigated by means of compression tests in the temperature range of 400–900°C and strain rate range of 0.001–1 s–1. The results show that the flow stress of pure copper increases with strain rate and decreasing deformation temperature, which is characterized by work-hardening, dynamic recovery, dynamic recrystallization, secondary work-hardening, etc. The activation energy of hot deformation is associated with deformation temperature and strain rate, and the average activation energy is calculated to be 303.8 kJ/mol. The flow stress prediction model based on GA+BP network provides a very good agreement with the true stress curve, which is instrumental for the guidance of hot working of pure copper. The flow instability occurs in the intermediate strain rate range (0.01–0.1 s–1). Based on the processing map anakysis, the high power dissipation corresponds to the dynamic recrystallization. Appropriate reduction of the deformation temperature or increased strain rate are beneficial for the grain refinement in the steady-state range of the processing map.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. W. H. Tian, A. L. Fan, H. Y. Gao, et al., “Comparison of microstructures in electroformed copper liners of shaped charges before and after plastic deformation at different strain rates,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 350, 160–167 (2003).10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00721-9 ↗
2. A. L. Fan, S. K. Li, W. H. Tian, and F. C. Wang, “Comparison of microstructures in electroformed and spin-formed copper liners of shaped charge undergone high-strain-rate deformation,” Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 17, 1447–1450 (2007).10.1016/S1003-6326(07)60292-1 ↗
3. A. L. Fan, S. K. Li, and W. H. Tian, “Grain growth and texture evolution in electroformed copper liners of shaped charges,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 474, 208–213 (2008).10.1016/j.msea.2007.04.001 ↗
4. O. Ozhoga-Maslovskaja, K. Naumenko, H. Altenbach, and O. Prygorniev, “Micromechanical simulation of grain boundary cavitation in copper considering nonproportional loading,” Comput. Mater. Sci., 96, 178–184 (2015).10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.08.050 ↗
5. Z. L. Wang, H. P. Wang, Z. H. Hou, et al., “Dynamic consolidation of W-Cu nano-alloy and its performance as liner materials,” Rare Metal Mat. Eng., 43, No. 5, 1051–1055 (2014).10.1016/S1875-5372(14)60099-0 ↗
6. C. W. Tan, S. N. Xu, L. Wang, et al., “Deformation behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy at different strain rates and temperatures,” Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 17, 347–352 (2007).
7. F. Zhang, J. Shen, X. D. Yan, and J. L. Sun, “Constitutive analysis to predict high-temperature flow stress in 2099 Al-Li alloy,” Rare Metal Mat. Eng., 43, No. 6, 1312–1318 (2014).10.1016/S1875-5372(14)60114-4 ↗
8. W. Li, H. Li, Z. X. Wang, and Z. Q. Zheng, “Constitutive equations for high temperature flow stress prediction of Al-14Cu-7Ce alloy,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 528, 4098–4103 (2011).10.1016/j.msea.2011.01.076 ↗
9. M. A. Jabbari Taleghani, E. M. Ruiz Navas, M. Salehi, and J. M. Torralba, “Hot deformation behaviour and flow stress prediction of 7075 aluminium alloy powder compacts during compression at elevated temperatures,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 534, 624–631 (2012).10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.019 ↗
10. H. Mirzadeh and A. Najafizadeh, “Flow stress prediction at hot working conditions,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 527, 1160–1164 (2010).10.1016/j.msea.2009.09.060 ↗
11. A. K. Maheshwari, “Prediction of flow stress for hot deformation processing,” Comput. Mater. Sci., 69, 350–358 (2013).10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.11.054 ↗
12. S. Serajzadeh and A. K. Taheri, “Prediction of flow stress at hot working condition,” Mech. Res. Commun., 30, 87–93 (2003).10.1016/S0093-6413(02)00354-3 ↗
13. G. Z. Quan, W. Q. Lv, Y. P. Mao, et al., “Prediction of flow stress in a wide temperature range involving phase transformation for as-cast Ti-6Al-2Zr-1Mo-1V alloy by artificial neural network,” Mater. Des., 50, 51–61 (2013).10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.033 ↗
14. A. K. Gupta, S. K. Singh, S. Reddy, and G. Hariharan, “Prediction of flow stress in dynamic strain aging regime of austenitic stainless steel 316 using artificial neural network,” Mater. Des., 35, 589–595 (2012).10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.060 ↗
15. X. S. Xia, Q. Chen, K. Zhang, et al., “Hot deformation behavior and processing map of coarse-grained Mg-Gd-Y-Nd-Zr alloy,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 587, 283–290 (2013).10.1016/j.msea.2013.08.066 ↗
16. F. A. Slooff, J. S. Dzwonczyk, J. Zhou, et al., “Hot workability analysis of extruded AZ magnesium alloys with processing maps,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 527, 735–744 (2010).10.1016/j.msea.2009.08.070 ↗
17. G. Meng, B. L. Li, H. M. Li, et al., “Hot deformation and processing maps of an Al-5.7 wt.% Mg alloy with erbium,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 517, 132–137 (2009).10.1016/j.msea.2009.03.068 ↗
18. Y. V. R. K. Prasad and K. P. Rao, “Effect of homogenization on the hot deformation behavior of cast AZ31 magnesium alloy,” Mater. Des., 30, 3723–3730 (2009).10.1016/j.matdes.2009.02.006 ↗