journal article·2014-09

Techniques for monitoring damage in ceramic matrix composites

Andrew Gyekenyesi

Publisher page

Abstract

This article offers a review of various nondestructive evaluation and structural health monitoring techniques that have been successfully utilized for assessing the damage state of woven ceramic matrix composites consisting of silicon carbide fibers and silicon carbide matrices. The techniques include acousto-ultrasonics, modal acoustic emissions, electrical resistance, impedance-based structural health monitoring, pulsed thermography, as well as thermoelastic stress analysis. The damage, in the form of distributed matrix cracks and delaminations, was introduced using multiple tactics. These included load/unload/reload uniaxial tensile tests, creep tests, and ballistic impact. Although other nondestructive evaluation techniques have been applied to this material system, the select nondestructive evaluation tools described here are limited to approaches that are of current research interest within programs at the NASA Glenn Research Center.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ohio Aerospace Institute, NASA Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field, Cleveland, OH, USA

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)01079-X10.1016/S0921-5093(98)01079-X ↗
2. 10.1016/S0927-796X(97)00021-110.1016/S0927-796X(97)00021-1 ↗
3. 10.1007/BF0035594610.1007/BF00355946 ↗
4. 10.1115/1.142105610.1115/1.1421056 ↗
5. Gorman MR · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 1990 · 1 · 358
6. Guthrie JD, Battat B, Severin BK (2000) Thermal protection systems for space vehicles. MaterialEASE (AMPTIAC) 11. Available at: http://amptiac.iitri.org
7. 10.1007/s11665-010-9622-410.1007/s11665-010-9622-4 ↗
8. 10.1177/1045389X0809903310.1177/1045389X08099033 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.05.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2005.05.010 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb04346.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb04346.x ↗
11. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00180-910.1016/S0266-3538(00)00180-9 ↗
12. 10.1177/00219983950290150110.1177/002199839502901501 ↗
13. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01195.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01195.x ↗
14. Martin R · 2002 · 82
15. Martin R · Materials Evaluation · 2003 · 61 · 611
16. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00065-910.1016/S0266-3538(02)00065-9 ↗
17. 10.1115/GT2013-9563810.1115/GT2013-95638 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00121-310.1016/S0266-3538(98)00121-3 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.10.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2003.10.022 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.013 ↗
21. Owen RB · 2011
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2000)6:4(153)10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2000)6:4(153) ↗
23. Roth D · 2002
24. Roth D · 2004 · 25 · 267
25. 10.1117/12.42103210.1117/12.421032 ↗
26. 10.1117/12.88202710.1117/12.882027 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.03310.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.033 ↗
28. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02587.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02587.x ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.005 ↗
30. 10.1177/10453890276169673310.1177/104538902761696733 ↗
31. 10.3390/s801032710.3390/s8010327 ↗