Delamination of surface accretions with structural waves: Piezo-actuation and power requirements
Source abstract
Abstract
Unwanted accretions on structures, such as aircraft and wind turbine icing or deposits in pipes, are a common problem, which can pose a serious safety threat if not treated effectively and punctually. In this article we investigate the capability of piezo-excited structural waves to delaminate accreted material. The core of the concept is to utilise the stress distribution associated with waves propagating through the structure to detach unwanted build-up. We apply a wave-based technique for modelling piezoelectric excitation based on semi-analytical finite elements to calculate the shear stress at the interface between the host structure and the accretion generated by piezo-actuated waves. Our analyses include the effects of the actuator’s dynamics and allow for comparing different types of actuators, identifying the most effective frequency of excitation and formulating realistic power requirements. For the dual purposes of proof of concept and validation of the model, we present a demonstration experiment in which patches of accreted material are removed from a beam-like waveguide with emulated anechoic terminations using ultrasonic excitation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Icing and De-icing Technologies · Smart Materials for Construction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Funding
University of Southampton Postgraduate Research Studentship Programme · Structural Funds in the Operational Programme - Innovative Economy (IE OP) financed from the European Regional Development Fund - Project “Modern material technologies in aerospace industry”
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Adachi K · 1998 · 759
2. 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.02110.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.021 ↗
3. Borigo CJ · 2014
4. 10.2514/3.1081910.2514/3.10819 ↗
5. DiPlacido N · 2013
6. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.02.05710.1016/j.apsusc.2011.02.057 ↗
7. Gao H · 2007
8. 10.1109/TUFFC.2009.104210.1109/TUFFC.2009.1042 ↗
9. Graff KF · 1991
10. 10.1006/jsvi.2000.331610.1006/jsvi.2000.3316 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0041-624X(03)00097-010.1016/S0041-624X(03)00097-0 ↗
12. Kalkowski MK · 2015
13. Kalkowski MK · 2012 · 1881
14. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.05.02210.1016/j.compstruc.2016.05.022 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.10.00510.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.10.005 ↗
16. 10.1109/58.39309610.1109/58.393096 ↗
17. 10.1163/016942410X53337210.1163/016942410X533372 ↗
18. 10.3233/JAE-14009110.3233/JAE-140091 ↗
19. 10.4271/2011-38-009810.4271/2011-38-0098 ↗
20. 10.2514/6.2006-228210.2514/6.2006-2282 ↗
21. Palacios JL · 2008
22. Palacios JL · 2008
23. 10.2514/1.J05014310.2514/1.J050143 ↗
24. 10.2514/1.C03120110.2514/1.C031201 ↗
25. Ramanathan S · 2005
26. Seppings RA · 2005
27. 10.1121/1.169501110.1121/1.1695011 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.07210.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.072 ↗
29. 10.1007/BF0035423910.1007/BF00354239 ↗
30. Voyiadjis GZ · 2008
31. 10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.06410.1016/j.energy.2015.04.064 ↗
32. Zhu Y · 2010