journal article·2012-07

A non-isothermal phase-field model for shape memory alloys: Numerical simulations of superelasticity and shape memory effect under stress-controlled conditions

Mirko Maraldi, Luisa Molari, Diego Grandi

Publisher page

Abstract

A phase-field–based model has been employed for numerical tests on the mechanical response of a shape memory alloy. The model consists of a time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau equation for a scalar order parameter describing the local phase of the material (austenite or martensite), coupled with the balance of linear momentum and the heat equations; the mechanical effect of the martensitic phase transition is described in terms of a uniaxial deformation strain along a fixed direction, making the model suited for predictions over monodimensional specimens. A number of numerical simulations under stress-controlled conditions have been performed to investigate the mechanical behaviour of the model; the results obtained are analysed in relation to the experimental evidences available in the literature and previous investigations under strain-controlled conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering (DIEM), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Department of Civil, Environmental and Materials Engineering (DICAM), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Department of Mathematics, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00021-010.1016/S1359-6454(01)00021-0 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00071-910.1016/S1359-6454(00)00071-9 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0020-7683(96)00232-610.1016/S0020-7683(96)00232-6 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.343057310.1063/1.3430573 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.physd.2009.10.00510.1016/j.physd.2009.10.005 ↗
7. 10.1177/1045389X930040021310.1177/1045389X9300400213 ↗
8. 10.1177/1045389X960070011110.1177/1045389X9600700111 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00112-010.1016/S0022-5096(01)00112-0 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11012-010-9286-z10.1007/s11012-010-9286-z ↗
11. 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00172-310.1016/S1359-6454(96)00172-3 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.04010.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.040 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.06.00610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.06.006 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2003.08.00610.1016/j.mechmat.2003.08.006 ↗
15. Leclerq S · Journal de Physique IV · 1995 · 5 · 513
16. 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90328-P10.1016/0956-7151(93)90328-P ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.13420610.1103/PhysRevB.66.134206 ↗
18. 10.1177/1045389X970080040210.1177/1045389X9700800402 ↗
19. 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00082-810.1016/0020-7683(95)00082-8 ↗
20. 10.1080/1537649060086286310.1080/15376490600862863 ↗
21. 10.1155/MPE/2006/5687610.1155/MPE/2006/56876 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.05.02710.1016/j.mechmat.2005.05.027 ↗
23. Tanaka K · Res Mechanica · 1986 · 18 · 251
24. Tobushi H · Archive of Mechanics · 2003 · 55 · 519
25. 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00180-210.1016/S1359-6454(96)00180-2 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.08.00710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.08.007 ↗
27. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/5/02310.1088/0964-1726/16/5/023 ↗