Road traveling test for vibration control of a wheel loader cabin installed with magnetorheological mounts
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a semi-active type magnetorheological (MR) fluid-based mount for effective vibration control of a wheel loader cabin. Traditional passive (viscous) mounts are inadequate at providing a large damping force and low elastic modulus over a wide frequency range; hence, the ride comfort of the driver and work efficiency per day are limited. In the present study, to overcome this limitation, MR mounts were designed considering principal geometry and dimensions of existing viscous mounts and installed to a vehicle cabin for vibration control. After investigating the field-dependent dynamic stiffness of the manufactured MR mounts, a field test on road traveling was conducted. In the field test, vibrations from the vertical and horizontal directions are evaluated with respect to the vehicle speed. In addition, vibration control performances between conventional viscous mount and the proposed MR mounts were compared showing superior performances of the reduced acceleration transmissibility and amplitude with on-off controlled MR mounts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Effects of Vibration on Health · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
NVH Team, R&D Center, Doosan Infracore Co. Ltd., Incheon, Republic of Korea
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1076/vesd.32.2.199.208710.1076/vesd.32.2.199.2087 ↗
2. 10.5050/KSNVE.2013.24.3.23610.5050/KSNVE.2013.24.3.236 ↗
3. 10.1177/1045389X0605528310.1177/1045389X06055283 ↗
4. Barber DE · Journal of Physics: Conference Series · 2009 · 149 · 4
5. Bovenzi M · G Ital Med Lav Ergon · 2005 · 27 · 58
6. British Standards Institution · 1987
7. Cho H · 2014 · 715
8. Dimarogonas AD · 2001
9. Goldasz J · ActaMechanica Automatica · 2011 · 5 · 29
10. Griffin MJ · 2012
11. Ha SH · 2009 · 581
12. 10.1177/1045389X0505391710.1177/1045389X05053917 ↗
13. International Organization for Standardization (1997) Mechanical Vibration and Shock—Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration – Part 1: General Requirements. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
14. Irwin JD, Graf ER (1997) Industrial Noise and Vibration Control. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, pp. 154–196, 267–314.
15. 10.1080/10402004.2017.135158710.1080/10402004.2017.1351587 ↗
16. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/8/08500510.1088/0964-1726/21/8/085005 ↗
17. 10.1006/jsvi.2001.425610.1006/jsvi.2001.4256 ↗
18. Shin KH · 2008
19. Shin MH · 2013 · 792
20. Rao SS · 2004
21. Thomson W · 1996
22. Yang SY · 2017 · 1
23. 10.1504/IJHVS.2019.09827810.1504/IJHVS.2019.098278 ↗
24. Yang SY · 2016 · 624
25. 10.1117/12.229680710.1117/12.2296807 ↗