journal article·2019-07

Fabrication and transient responses of highly flexible and humidity-insensitive ionic polymer–metal composites in different sensory modes

Mohammad Gudarzi, Patrick Smolinski, Qing-Ming Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

Ionic polymer–metal composites, although with attracting properties such as flexibility, easy processing, resilience, and high sensitivity, have some drawbacks including the fragility of electrodes and strong humidity dependence which limit their practical applications. This study aims to fabricate ionic polymer–metal composites with sputtered gold thin film electrodes and to coat them with a waterproof acrylic material to extend their consistent sensory response over time. For this aim, after explaining the sensing mechanism of ionic polymer–metal composites based on streaming potential hypothesis for compression, bending, and shear modes, the fabrication process of the proposed ionic polymer–metal composites is presented. A signal conditioner is designed based on the measurement results of the equivalent resistance and capacitance of the devices. A shock tube setup is then utilized to obtain the impulse response of fabricated ionic polymer–metal composite devices in different modes of deformation. To verify how this waterproof coating maintains the ionic polymer–metal composite’s sensing performance, some experiments are carried out over a period of 6 days after fabrication for both acrylic-coated and uncoated samples. Analyzing the results shows that fabricated ionic polymer–metal composites represent an appropriate linearity, sensitivity, and reliability over time and this coating approach not only suppresses the diluent permeation but also has a negligible effect on the ionic polymer–metal composite electromechanical properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dielectric materials and actuators · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/5/01410.1088/0964-1726/13/5/014 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10853-006-0632-410.1007/s10853-006-0632-4 ↗
3. 10.1109/TMECH.2009.203088710.1109/TMECH.2009.2030887 ↗
4. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/1/01500310.1088/0964-1726/19/1/015003 ↗
5. Badri A · International Journal of Electrochemical Science · 2011 · 6 · 317810.1016/S1452-3981(23)18244-7 ↗
6. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/9/09401110.1088/0964-1726/20/9/094011 ↗
7. Bar-Cohen Y · 2004
8. 10.1016/j.sna.2007.06.03510.1016/j.sna.2007.06.035 ↗
9. 10.1002/polb.2036710.1002/polb.20367 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.sna.2004.03.04310.1016/j.sna.2004.03.043 ↗
11. 10.1007/s12541-012-0020-810.1007/s12541-012-0020-8 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/3/01010.1088/0964-1726/15/3/010 ↗
13. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/01/01501410.1088/0964-1726/17/01/015014 ↗
14. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/01/01500910.1088/0964-1726/17/01/015009 ↗
15. 10.1109/TIM.2009.202661310.1109/TIM.2009.2026613 ↗
16. 10.1109/TIM.2011.211887010.1109/TIM.2011.2118870 ↗
17. 10.1109/TMECH.2009.202781210.1109/TMECH.2009.2027812 ↗
18. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/2/S1010.1088/0964-1726/16/2/S10 ↗
19. 10.1002/polb.2325510.1002/polb.23255 ↗
20. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/1/01501110.1088/0964-1726/25/1/015011 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.sna.2016.01.04710.1016/j.sna.2016.01.047 ↗
22. 10.1098/rsta.2013.029910.1098/rsta.2013.0299 ↗
23. 10.1177/1045389X0809960410.1177/1045389X08099604 ↗
24. Gao F, Weiland LM (2009) The streaming potential method for modeling the electromechanical responses of ionic polymer transducers. In: SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring. International Society for Optics and Photonics. Available at: http://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Paper/10.1117/12.81770710.1117/12.817707 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.345606610.1063/1.3456066 ↗
26. 10.1177/1045389X1140978910.1177/1045389X11409789 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.02.02910.1016/j.measurement.2017.02.029 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.sna.2017.04.01010.1016/j.sna.2017.04.010 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.09.03610.1016/j.measurement.2016.09.036 ↗
30. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/6/00510.1088/0964-1726/15/6/005 ↗
31. 10.3938/jkps.59.340110.3938/jkps.59.3401 ↗
32. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/3/03502010.1088/0964-1726/22/3/035020 ↗
33. 10.1177/1045389X1454677910.1177/1045389X14546779 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.sna.2014.05.01310.1016/j.sna.2014.05.013 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11012-015-0164-610.1007/s11012-015-0164-6 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.282540410.1063/1.2825404 ↗
37. 10.1177/1045389X0201300197810.1177/1045389X02013001978 ↗
38. Oguro K · Journal of Micromachine Society · 1992 · 5 · 27
39. 10.1063/1.369318410.1063/1.3693184 ↗
40. 10.1038/nmat207410.1038/nmat2074 ↗
41. 10.1088/0964-1726/1/1/01410.1088/0964-1726/1/1/014 ↗
42. 10.1088/0964-1726/10/4/32710.1088/0964-1726/10/4/327 ↗
43. 10.1088/0964-1726/7/6/00110.1088/0964-1726/7/6/001 ↗
44. 10.1021/jp074611q10.1021/jp074611q ↗
45. 10.1109/MEMSYS.1999.74674810.1109/MEMSYS.1999.746748 ↗
46. 10.1088/1361-665X/26/3/03503010.1088/1361-665X/26/3/035030 ↗
47. 10.12989/sss.2010.6.3.21110.12989/sss.2010.6.3.211 ↗
48. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/9/09401310.1088/0964-1726/20/9/094013 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b1263410.1021/acs.jpcb.5b12634 ↗
50. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/5/05502410.1088/0964-1726/25/5/055024 ↗
51. 10.1063/1.496173210.1063/1.4961732 ↗