journal article·2004-02

Macroscopic and Microscopic Constitutive Models of Shape Memory Alloys Based on Phase Interaction Energy Function: A Review

Yuji Matsuzaki, Hisashi Naito

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents a summary of a series of our macroscopic and microscopic constitutive models for pseudoelasticity and shape memory effect of a shape memory alloy wire or strip based on a general function of the dissipation potential, called phase interaction energy function. Our model may well predict in a unified way complex stress–strain relationships among austenitic, martensitic and rhombohedral phases, including inner hysteresis loops appearing in a bounding loop, effect of loading cycles accompanying rapid change in temperature of the alloy due to dynamic loadings, etc. Some comment on existing constitutive models is given for comparison. A future research direction of shape memory alloys will briefly be addressed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Aerospace Engineering, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan

Department of Assistive Technology, National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, 4-1 Namiki, Tokorozawa 359-8555, Japan

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/1045389X930040021310.1177/1045389X9300400213 ↗
2. 10.1177/1045389X940050030610.1177/1045389X9400500306 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0749-6419(96)00030-710.1016/S0749-6419(96)00030-7 ↗
4. 10.4050/JAHS.45.22810.4050/JAHS.45.228 ↗
5. 10.2514/2.156110.2514/2.1561 ↗
6. Epps, J.J. and Chopra, I. 1997 ‘‘Comparative Evaluation of Shape Memory Alloy Constitutive Models with Test Data,’’ In: Proceed. 38th AIAA Struct. Dynamics and Mater. Conference and Adapt. Struct. Forum, AIAA-97-1194, pp. 1425–1437 .10.2514/6.1997-1194 ↗
7. Falk, F. 1983. ‘‘One-Dimensional Model of Shape Memory Alloys,’’ Archieves of Mechanics, 35: 63–84 .
8. Fung, Y.C. 1965. Foundation of Solid Mechanics, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey .
9. 10.1299/kikaia.61.262910.1299/kikaia.61.2629 ↗
10. Kamita, T. and Matsuzaki, Y. 1996. ‘‘Pseudoelastic Theory of Shape Memory Alloys,’’ Proceed. of SPIE’s 1996 Symposium on SmartStruct. and Mater., 2717: 509–516 .10.1117/12.239053 ↗
11. Kamita, T. and Matsuzaki, Y. 1997. ‘‘Pseudoelastic Hysteresis of Shape Memory Alloys,’’ In: Inoue, K. et al. (eds), Proceed. of First US-Japan Workshop on Smart Mater. and Struct., pp. 117–124 , The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society.
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/7/4/00810.1088/0964-1726/7/4/008 ↗
13. 10.1016/0001-6160(59)90170-110.1016/0001-6160(59)90170-1 ↗
14. 10.1016/0022-5096(96)00013-010.1016/0022-5096(96)00013-0 ↗
15. 10.1007/BF0155707810.1007/BF01557078 ↗
16. 10.1177/1045389X940050051410.1177/1045389X9400500514 ↗
17. 10.1177/1045389X900010020510.1177/1045389X9000100205 ↗
18. Malovrh, B. and Gandhi, F. 1999. ‘‘Mechanism Based Phenomenological Models for Pseudoelastic Damping Behavior of Shape Memory Alloys,’’ In: Proceed. of 40th AIAA Struct. Dynamics and Mater. Conference and Adapt. Struct. Forum, AIAA 99-1544, 2723–2733 .10.2514/6.1999-1544 ↗
19. Malovrh, B. and Gandhi, F. 2000. ‘‘Time Domain Mechanical Models for SMA Pseudoelastic Damping Behavior,’’ In: Proceed of SPIE 2000 Symposium on Smart Struct. and Mater., SPIE 3989-32.10.1117/12.384573 ↗
20. Matsuzaki, Y., Naito, H. and Yamamoto, T. 1998. ‘‘Pseudoelastic Behavior of Shape Memory Alloys with Temperature Change,’’ In: Proceed. of 40th Structures and Strength Conference, pp. 209–212 , Japanese Society for Aeronautics and Space Science.
21. Matsuzaki, Y., Naito, H., and Ikeda, T. 2000. ‘‘Pseudoelastic Thermal Behavior of Shape Memory Alloys,’’ Proceed. of 10th Int. Conf. Adaptive Struct. and Tech., pp. 208–214 , Technomic Pub., Lancaster.10.1088/0964-1726/10/5/305 ↗
22. 10.1088/0964-1726/10/5/30510.1088/0964-1726/10/5/305 ↗
23. Matsuzaki, Y., Funami, K. and Naito, H. 2002. ‘‘Inner Loops of Pseudoelastic Hysteresis of Shape Memory Alloys,’’ In: Proceed. of SPIE 2002 Symposium on Smart Struct. and Mater., SPIE 4699-49.10.1117/12.474993 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.33492510.1063/1.334925 ↗
25. McCormick, P.G., Liu, Y. and Miyazaki, S. 1993. ‘‘Intrinsic Thermal-Mechanical Behavior Associated with the Stress-Induced Martensitic Transformation in NiTi,’’ Materials Science and Engineering, A167: 51–56 .10.1016/0921-5093(93)90336-D ↗
26. 10.1016/0956-7151(91)90305-K10.1016/0956-7151(91)90305-K ↗
27. Naito, H., Matsuzaki, Y., Funami, K. and Ikeda, T. 2001a. ‘‘Frequency Characteristics of Pseudoelasticity of Shape Memory Alloys,’’ In: Proceedings of AIAA Adapt. Struct. Forum, AIAA 2001-1355.10.2514/6.2001-1355 ↗
28. Naito, H., Matsuzaki, Y. and Ikeda, T. 2001b. ‘‘A Unified Model of Thermomechanical Behavior of Shape Memory Alloys,’’ In: Proceed. of SPIE 2001 Symposium on Smart Struct. and Mater., SPIE 4333-52.10.1117/12.432768 ↗
29. 10.1106/1H1M-208B-7BHJ-67JD10.1106/1H1M-208B-7BHJ-67JD ↗
30. 10.1063/1.35123810.1063/1.351238 ↗
31. Raniecki, B., Lexcellent, C. and Tanaka, K. 1992. ‘‘Thermodynamic Model of Pseudoelastic Behaviour of Shape Memory Alloys,’’ Archieves of Mechanics, 44: 261–284 .
32. Tanaka, K. 1986. ‘‘A Thermomechanical Sketch of Shape Memory Effect: One-dimensional Tensile Behavior,’’ Res. Mechanica, 18: 251–263 .
33. 10.1299/kikaia.57.274710.1299/kikaia.57.2747 ↗
34. 10.1177/1045389X980090020510.1177/1045389X9800900205 ↗