Active Length Control of Shape Memory Alloy Wires Using Reinforcement Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Actively controlled shape memory alloy actuators are useful for a variety of applications that require accurate shape control. For shape memory alloy wires, strain is modulated with temperature, usually by an applied voltage difference across the length. Numerical simulation using reinforcement learning has previously been used for determining the temperature–strain relationship of a shape memory alloy wire and for synthesizing a limited control policy that relates applied temperature to desired strain. However, learning the voltage–strain relationship is of more practical interest in synthesizing feedback control laws for shape memory alloy wires since the control input in practical applications will be an applied voltage that modulates temperature. This article implements a Sarsa-based algorithm for determining a feedback control law in voltage–strain space and validates it experimentally. Experimental results presented in this article demonstrate the ability to control a shape memory alloy specimen from arbitrary initial strains ranging from zero to maximum, including intermediate strains, to an arbitrary intermediate strain. The results also demonstrate theability to control the specimen from similar arbitrary initial values of strain to zero strain. The voltage–strain learning algorithm developed in this article is a promising candidate for synthesizing practical shape memory alloy actuator feedback control laws.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Piezoelectric Actuators and Control · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Aerospace Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/1045389X0505996510.1177/1045389X05059965 ↗
2. Banks H. · Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures · 1997 · 8
3. 10.1177/1045389X0809382510.1177/1045389X08093825 ↗
4. Bo Z. · International Journal of Engineering Science · 1999 · 37
5. 10.1016/0020-7225(89)90115-810.1016/0020-7225(89)90115-8 ↗
6. 10.2514/6.2005-716010.2514/6.2005-7160 ↗
7. 10.2514/1.3621710.2514/1.36217 ↗
8. 10.1177/10597123050130010110.1177/105971230501300101 ↗
9. 10.1177/1045389X0404279610.1177/1045389X04042796 ↗
10. 10.1080/1075941960894586110.1080/10759419608945861 ↗
11. 10.1117/12.43651410.1117/12.436514 ↗
12. Lagoudas D.C. · 2008
13. Machado L. · 2007
14. Mitchell T.M. · 1997
15. Mavroidis C. · Automation, Miniature Robotics and Sensors for Non-Destructive Testing and Evaluation · 1999 · 10
16. 10.1016/0001-6160(87)90276-810.1016/0001-6160(87)90276-8 ↗
17. Russell S. · 2003
18. 10.1177/10597123970060020110.1177/105971239700600201 ↗
19. 10.1177/1045389X0303468710.1177/1045389X03034687 ↗
20. Sutton R. · 1998
21. 10.2514/1.1138810.2514/1.11388 ↗
22. 10.1109/TSMCB.2008.92201810.1109/TSMCB.2008.922018 ↗
23. 10.1177/027836490708498310.1177/0278364907084983 ↗
24. Waram T. · 1993
25. 10.1177/1045389X980090060510.1177/1045389X9800900605 ↗
26. 10.1177/105971230607625310.1177/1059712306076253 ↗