journal article·2004-04

Aerodynamic Performance of the Smart Wing Control Effectors

Brian Sanders, Dave Cowan, Lewes Scherer

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents and discusses the wind tunnel results obtained during Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Smart Wing program. A series of four tests was conducted, two in each phase. The purpose of the tests was to evaluate the performance of smart material based control effectors in representative aerodynamic environments. In Phase 1, wing twist using a Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) torque tube and smoothly contoured trailing edge surfaces enabled by SMA wires were evaluated on a semi-span, 16% scale model of a typical fighter wing. The focus of Phase 2 was to address the design and demonstration of a high-frequency, large-deflection, and smoothly contoured trailing edge control surface capable of a spanwise variation in deflection. The actuation system for this control surface was based on piezoelectric (PZT) ultrasonic motors. A smoothly contoured leading edge control surface was also built and tested using SMA wires. These designs were evaluated on a 30%, full-span model of a representative Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle (UCAV). In each wind tunnel entry comparisons were made to the performance of conventional control surfaces. Successful results included: improved aileron effectiveness at high dynamic pressures; demonstrated improvements in lateral and longitudinal control effectiveness with smoothly contoured control surfaces over conventional hinged control surfaces; continuous spanwise shape control; and, large deflections at rates over 80°/s, which is well within the desired deflection aileron rates for control of fighter aircraft.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Air Force Research Laboratory, AFRL/VASD, 2210 8th Street, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7531, USA

NextGen Aeronautics, Inc., 2780 Skypark Dr., St. 400, Torrance, CA 90505, USA

Northrop Grumman Corporation, One Hornet Way, MS 9G21/W6, El Segundo, CA 90245, USA

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Abbott, I.H. and Von Doenhoff, A.E. (1959). Theory of Wing Sections, pp. 188–246. Dover Publications .
2. Bartley-Cho, J.D., Wang, D.P., West, M.N. July 2001. “ Development, Control, and Test Results of High-Rate, Hingeless Trailing Edge Control Surface for the Smart Wing Phase 2 Wind Tunnel Model ,” Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials, 3674: 237–248 .10.1117/12.475100 ↗
3. Bowers, R., Albion, H. and Pahle, J.W. November 1996. “Thrust Vectoring on the NASA F-18 High Alpha Research Vehicle,” NASA TM-4771, Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards Air Force Base, California .
4. 10.4050/JAHS.45.22810.4050/JAHS.45.228 ↗
5. Dunne, J., Pitt, D., White, E. and Garcia, E. 2000. “ Ground Demonstration of the Smart Inlet ,” AIAA –2000-1630, Presented at the 41st Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, April 3–6, Atlanta GA.10.2514/6.2000-1630 ↗
6. 10.2514/2.279610.2514/2.2796 ↗
7. Hall, J.M. 1989. “Executive Summary AFTI/F-111 Mission Adaptive Wing,” WRDC-TR-89-2083, Wright Research Development Center, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base .
8. Henderson, D., Moses, R.W., Ryall, T. and Zimcik, D. 1999. “Overview of an active buffeting alleviation system,” CEAS/AIAA/ICASE/NASA Langley International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, pp. 615–625, Williamsburg VA .
9. Kudva, J. 1999. “Northrop Grumman Corporation, Smart Materials and Structures – Smart Wing Phase 1 Final Report,” AFRL-ML-WP-TR-1999-4162, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base .
10. 10.2514/3.4704510.2514/3.47045 ↗
11. Martin, C.A., Scherer, L.B., Flanagan, J.S. and Carpenter, B.F. July 2001. “ Design, Fabrication and Testing of Scaled Wind Tunnel Model for the Smart Wing Phase 2 Program ,” Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials, 3674: 237–248 .
12. Miller, G.D. 1988. “Active Flexible Wing (AFW) Technology,” Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratory, TR-87-3096, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH .
13. 10.2514/2.77510.2514/2.775 ↗
14. 10.2514/2.306210.2514/2.3062 ↗
15. Sultan, C. and Skelton, R.E. 1998. “ Tendon Control Deployment of Tensegrity Structures ,” Proceedings of SPIE 5th International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, March 1–5, San Diego, USA.