journal article·1996-01

Energy-Based Comparison of Solid-State Induced-Strain Actuators

Victor Giurgiutiu, Craig A. Rogers, Zaffir Chaudhry

Publisher page

Abstract

A study of published literature and information from piezoelectric, electrostrictive, and magnetostrictive actuator vendors has been undertaken to establish the mechanical and electrical operating characteristics of the actuators, and to compare them using output energy density criteria. Output energy values of up to 0.666 J can be achieved with off-the-shelf actuators. Energy density per unit volume was found in the range 1.816-7.280 J/dm 3 . Energy density per unit mass was found in the range 0.233-0.900 J/kg. In one isolated case, higher energy densities of 11.9 J/dm 3 and 1.09 J/kg were identified for a small co-fired PMN stack of 0.00481 J total energy. Energy transformation efficiency between input electric energy and output mechanical energy was found to be: 17-27% for adhesively-bonded PZT and PMN stacks, 5-20% for co-fired PZT and PMN stacks, and 67.1% for TERFENOL-D devices. The overall performance of induced-strain actuators based on output energy density criteria was found to vary widely from vendor to vendor, and even from one model to another within the same vendor catalogue list. These variations are attributed to progress being made currently in both the active material technology and in the detailed mechanical construction of induced-strain actuators based on these materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0261

United Technologies Research Center, 411 Silver Lane, MS 129-73, East Hartford, CT 06108

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. 1. Galvagni, J. and B. Rawal. 1991. "A Comparison of Piezoelectric and Electrostrictive Actuator Stacks", Paper 1543-50, SPIE Vol. 1543 Adaptive and Adaptive Optical Components, pp. 296-300.10.1117/12.51206 ↗
2. Giurgiutiu, V. · 1995
3. 3. Giurgiutiu, V., Z. Chaudhry and C. A. Rogers. 1995b. "Stiffness Issues in the Design of ISA Displacement Amplification Devices: Case Study of a Hydraulic Displacement Amplifier", Smart Structures and Materials 1995, Paper #2443-12, SPIE, 2443:105-119.10.1117/12.208250 ↗
4. Giurgiutiu, V. · 565
5. Janker, P. · 126
6. 6. Straub, F. K. and D. J. Merkley. 1995. "Design of a Smart Material Actuator for Rotor Control", 1995 SPIE North American Conference on Smart Structures and Materials, Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, Paper #2443-10, SPIE, 2443:89-104.10.1117/12.208249 ↗
7. 7. AVX Corporation, Private Communication, Myrtle Beach, SC 29577.
8. 8. Burleigh Instruments, Inc. Private Communication, Burleigh Park, Fishers, NY 14453.
9. 9. EDO Corporation, Private Communication, 2645 South 300 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84115.
10. 10. Etrema Products, Inc., Private Communication, 2500 North Loop Drive, Ames, Iowa 50010.
11. 11. Morgan Matroc, Electroceramics Division. Private Communication, 232 Forbes Rd., Bedford, OH 44146.
12. 12. Polytec PI, Inc., Private Communication, 3001 Redhill Ave., Bldg. 5-102, Costa Mesa, CA 92626.
13. 13. Tokin America, Inc., Private Communication, 155 Nicholson Ln., San Jose, CA 95134.
14. 14. Kinetic Ceramics, Inc., Private Communication, 26242 Industrial Blvd., Hayward, CA 94545.