journal article·1991-07

Static Aeroelastic Control Using Strain Actuated Adaptive Structures

Kenneth B. Lazarus, Edward F. Crawley, Jonathan D. Bohlmann

Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, the feasibility of using representative box wing adaptive structures for static aeroelastic control is examined. A deformable typical section is uti lized to derive the optimal and suboptimal relations for induced strain actuated adaptive wings, and the relations developed are used to design representative adaptive lifting sur faces which are assessed in trade studies. The optimal relations developed showed that op timal adaptive airfoil designs are possible for some realistic configurations, and effective sub-optimal designs can be achieved for others. In addition, the important parameters associated with inducing curvature and twist, thereby altering the lifting forces on the air foil, are determined. The most important of which were found to be the airfoil thickness ratio, the actuation strain produced by the induced strain actuators, and the relative stiff ness ratio of the actuator to the wing skin for both camber and twist control. The stiffness coupling parameter and the wing aspect ratio were also found to be important for twist control. The potential benefits of using adaptive airfoils for aeroelastic control, rather than conventional articulated control surfaces, is demonstrated in trade studies. It was found that greater control authority along with a lower weight penalty is achievable using adap tive aeroelastic structures for a variety of wing designs. Thus, strain actuated adaptive wings may be used rather than conventional lifting surfaces to increase performance while reducing weight, decreasing loads in critical areas, improving the radar cross section, and maximizing the lift-to-drag ratio for many flight conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Space Engineering Research Center Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139

Advanced Methods Group General Dynamics Corporation Fort Worth Division Fort Worth, TX 76101

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. J.E. and Ashton, · 1970
2. S N Amos · 1988
3. S. and Burke, · IEEE Control Systems Magazine · 1987 · 7
4. L. , Chen, · Proceedings of the 30th SDM, Mobile, AL, April · 1989
5. 10.2514/3.5604910.2514/3.56049 ↗
6. 10.2514/3.979210.2514/3.9792 ↗
7. E.F. Crawley,and K.B. Lazarus. 1989 "Induced Strain Actuation of Isotropic and Anisotropic Plates", AIAA Paper No 89-1326, Proceedings of the 30th SDM Conference Mobile, AL, April,10.2514/6.1989-1326 ↗
8. E.F., Crawley, · 1988
9. J.L. , Fanson, · Proceedings of the 30th SDM Conference, Mobile, AL, April · 1989
10. R.L. and Forward, · 1981
11. N.W. and Hagood, · paper presented at the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Boston, MA, August · 1989
12. S. , Hanagud, · Proceedings of the 26th SDM Conference, April · 1985
13. D.W. and Jensen, · AIAA Journal, · 1984 · 22
14. R.M. Jones, · 1975
15. K.B. and Lazarus, · 1989
16. Lazarus, K.B. · 1990
17. Lee, C.K. · J. Acoustical Society of America · 1989 · 85
18. 10.2514/3.4532110.2514/3.45321 ↗
19. Rogers, W.A. · 1982
20. Wada, B.K.
21. 10.2514/3.4509810.2514/3.45098 ↗