Topology optimization and hybrid production of an AlSi10Mg robotic arm gripper: A case study
Source abstract
Abstract
The integration of simulation-driven design tools into additive manufacturing (AM) technologies offers new pathways for producing lightweight structures. In addition, some simulation tools enable the prediction of potential defects and failures caused by residual stresses prior to manufacturing. In this study, a systematic workflow combining topology optimization (TO), laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB/M), and hybrid post-processing is presented for the development of a robotic arm gripper. Using finite element (FE)-based TO, the original gripper geometry was redesigned to achieve a 65% mass reduction, decreasing the component weight from 570 to 192 g, while maintaining structural integrity. Residual stress accumulation and potential distortion occurring during PBF-LB/M were predicted using inherent-strain-based simulations, including the stress relief achieved by post–heat treatment scenario. The optimized design was manufactured using AlSi10Mg powder via PBF-LB/M, followed by 300°C for 2 h annealing, and subsequently refined through drilling, tapping, and surface finishing as part of a hybrid AM approach. Post-processing reduced the surface roughness from 3.4 (as-built) to 0.035 µm on functional contact regions, enabling precise joint compatibility. This study provides a transferable engineering framework that integrates computational design, distortion prediction, and hybrid manufacturing to realize lightweight, functionally efficient structures for robotic applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topology Optimization in Engineering · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electric Electronic Engineering, Sivas University of Science and Technology, Türkiye
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sivas University of Science and Technology, Türkiye
Institute of Defense Technologies, Sivas University of Science and Technology, Türkiye
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Afkhami S Javaheri V Dabiri E et al. (2022) Effects of manufacturing parameters heat treatment and machining on the physical and mechanical properties of 13Cr10Ni1·7Mo2Al0·4Mn0·4Si steel processed by laser powder bed fusion. Materials Science and Engineering A 832: 142402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14240210.1016/j.msea.2021.142402 ↗
2. Ascher M Späth R (2025) Topology optimization of additively manufactured adherends for increased adhesive bond strength. Materials 18(10): 2170. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1810217010.3390/ma18102170 ↗
3. Batista RC Agarwal A Gurung A et al. (2024) Topological and lattice-based AM optimization for improving the structural efficiency of robotic arms. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering 10: 1422539. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2024.142253910.3389/fmech.2024.1422539 ↗
4. Branco R Berto F Li B et al. (2022) Solid stress-distribution-oriented design and topology optimization of 3D-printed heterogeneous lattice structures with light weight and high specific rigidity. Polymers 14: 2807. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1414280710.3390/polym14142807 ↗
5. Caliskan M Hafizoglu H Babacan N (2024) Dynamic mechanical properties of selective laser-melted AlSi10Mg lattice structures: Experimental and numerical analysis with emphasis on Johnson-cook model parameters. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 132: 3861–3875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13570-310.1007/s00170-024-13570-3 ↗
6. Collet M Bruggi M Duysinx P (2017) Topology optimization for minimum weight with compliance and simplified nominal stress constraints for fatigue resistance. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 55(3): 839–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1510-610.1007/s00158-016-1510-6 ↗
7. Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: A review. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 23: 1917–1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
8. Jiménez A Bidare P Hassanin H et al. (2021) Powder-based laser hybrid additive manufacturing of metals: A review. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 114(1–2): 63–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06855-410.1007/s00170-021-06855-4 ↗
9. Ko KH Kang HG Huh YH et al. (2022) Effects of heat treatment on the microstructure residual stress and mechanical properties of Co-Cr alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 126: 105051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10505110.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105051 ↗
10. Kumaran M Senthilkumar V Sathies T (2023) Design and optimization of artificial intelligence robot arm printable by a metal-based additive manufacturing process. In: Advances in Additive Manufacturing: Artificial Intelligence Nature-Inspired and Biomanufacturing. Additive Manufacturing Materials and Technologies. Elsevier pp.449–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91834-3.00025-910.1016/B978-0-323-91834-3.00025-9 ↗
11. Lappalainen N Lappalainen N (2021) Additive manufacturing and simulation in design and manufacturing of a robotic gripper. Master’s Thesis.
12. Leary M (2017) Surface roughness optimisation for selective laser melting (SLM): Accommodating relevant and irrelevant surfaces. In: Brandt M (ed.) Laser Additive Manufacturing: Materials Design Technologies and Applications. Woodhead Publishing Series in Electronic and Optical Materials pp.99–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100433-3.00004-X10.1016/B978-0-08-100433-3.00004-X ↗
13. Loyda A Arizmendi M Ruiz de Galarreta S et al. (2023) Meeting high precision requirements of additively manufactured components through hybrid manufacturing. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 40: 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.11.01110.1016/j.cirpj.2022.11.011 ↗
14. Maleki E Bagherifard S Bandini M et al. (2021) Surface post-treatments for metal additive manufacturing: Progress challenges and opportunities. Additive Manufacturing 37: 101619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10161910.1016/j.addma.2020.101619 ↗
15. Matjeke VJ Moopanar C Bolokang AS et al. (2020) Effect of heat treatment time on the microstructure and mechanical deformation behavior of additive-manufactured AlSi10Mg components. Progress in Additive Manufacturing 5(4): 379–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-020-00139-110.1007/s40964-020-00139-1 ↗
16. Mower TM Long MJ (2016) Mechanical behavior of additive manufactured powder-bed laser-fused materials. Materials Science and Engineering A 651: 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.06810.1016/j.msea.2015.10.068 ↗
17. Ni C Zhu L Zheng Z et al. (2020a) Effects of machining surface and laser beam scanning strategy on machinability of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V alloy in milling. Materials & Design 194: 108880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10888010.1016/j.matdes.2020.108880 ↗
18. Ni C Zhu L Zheng Z et al. (2020b) Effect of material anisotropy on ultra-precision machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 848: 156457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15645710.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156457 ↗
19. Ninpetch P Kowitwarangkul P Chalermkarnnon P et al. (2022) Numerical modeling of distortion of Ti-6Al-4V components manufactured using laser powder bed fusion. Metals 12: 1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/MET1209148410.3390/met12091484 ↗
20. Pakkanen J Calignano F Trevisan F et al. (2016) Study of internal channel surface roughnesses manufactured by selective laser melting in aluminum and titanium alloys. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 47: 3837–3844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3478-710.1007/s11661-016-3478-7 ↗
21. Pratheesh Kumar S Elangovan S Mohanraj R et al. (2021) Review on the evolution and technology of State-of-the-Art metal additive manufacturing processes. Materials Today Proceedings 46: 7907–7920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.56710.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.567 ↗
22. Ramadani R Pal S Belšak A et al. (2025) Selective laser melting of a Ti-6Al-4V lattice-structure gear: Design topology optimization and experimental validation. Applied Sciences 15(14): 7949. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1514794910.3390/app15147949 ↗
23. Salmi A Atzeni E Iuliano L et al. (2017) Experimental analysis of residual stresses on AlSi10Mg parts produced by means of selective laser melting (SLM). Procedia CIRP 62: 458–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.06.03010.1016/j.procir.2016.06.030 ↗
24. Shaw PK Dwivedi S Dixit AR et al. (2025) Understanding residual stress and microhardness variations in laser powder bed fusion fabricated Ti-6Al-4V: Thermo-mechanical simulation and experimental insights post heat treatment. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology 12(4): 1309–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-024-00670-410.1007/s40684-024-00670-4 ↗
25. Siewert M Neugebauer F Epp J et al. (2019) Validation of mechanical layer equivalent method for simulation of residual stresses in additive manufactured components. Computers & Mathematics With Applications 78: 2407–2416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2018.08.01610.1016/j.camwa.2018.08.016 ↗
26. Stavropoulos P Bikas H Avram O et al. (2020) Hybrid subtractive–additive manufacturing processes for high value-added metal components. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 111: 645–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06099-810.1007/s00170-020-06099-8 ↗
27. Taufek T Manurung YH Lüder S et al. (2020) Distortion analysis of SLM product of SS316L using inherent strain method. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering 834: 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/834/1/01201110.1088/1757-899X/834/1/012011 ↗
28. Vafadar A Guzzomi F Rassau A et al. (2021) Advances in Metal Additive Manufacturing: A review of common processes industrial applications and current challenges. Applied Sciences 11: 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1103121310.3390/app11031213 ↗
29. Zerbst U Bruno G Buffiere JY et al. (2021) Damage tolerant design of additively manufactured metallic components subjected to cyclic loading: State of the art and challenges. Progress in Materials Science 121: 100786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.10078610.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100786 ↗