Multi-disciplinary and multi-objective optimization problem applied to a morphing blade cascade study
Source abstract
Abstract
Multi-disciplinary design optimization (MDO) problems incorporate a number of coupled disciplines that need to be simultaneously solved to achieve a complete solution. Such problems are common in turbomachinery blade design, where MDO usually integrates constraints coming from aerodynamics and structural mechanics. In the present work, a multi-disciplinary and multi-objective optimization problem is formulated and applied to a morphing blade cascade study. An aero-structure coupling strategy is also integrated in the framework to take into account the interactions between aerodynamics and structural mechanics. The morphed blade geometry is obtained by means of a shape memory alloy (SMA) actuator that morphs and adapts the blade leading-edge shape to the inflow conditions in order to improve the aerodynamic flow characteristics, and therefore the overall cascade performance. A surrogate-based optimization strategy is applied to find the Pareto points representing the optimal blade configurations in terms of total pressure loss coefficient at design and off-design conditions. Results show a decrease up to 55% in the total pressure loss coefficient at the off-design condition with a Young’s modulus of about 100 GPa and an actuator length between 30 and 45 mm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Topology Optimization in Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
German Aerospace Center (DLR), Braunschweig, Germany
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1115/1.405317410.1115/1.4053174 ↗
2. 10.12989/aas.2016.3.2.14910.12989/aas.2016.3.2.149 ↗
3. 10.1115/GT2009-5998210.1115/GT2009-59982 ↗
4. Dornberger R · Multidisciplinary turbomachinery blade design optimization · 2020
5. 10.2514/1.3901610.2514/1.39016 ↗
6. Heinrich RNJ · Fluid-structure coupling for aerodynamic analysis and design: A dlr perspective · 2008
7. 10.1080/19942060.2008.1101521710.1080/19942060.2008.11015217 ↗
8. Jha R · 1999
9. Watanabe H · Optimization of microturbine aerodynamics using cfd, inverse design and fem structural analysis: 1st report—compressor design · 2004
10. Moroz L · Methods and tools for multidisciplinary optimization of axial turbine stages with relatively long blades · 2004
11. Li L · Turbine blade temperature transfer using the load surface method · 2006
12. MATLAB (2018) https://de.mathworks.com/help/gads/surrogate-optimization-algorithm.html
13. 10.2514/1.J05271510.2514/1.J052715 ↗
14. 10.1177/1045389X1141408910.1177/1045389X11414089 ↗
15. Panchenko V · Preliminary multi-disciplinary optimization in turbomachinery design · 2003
16. 10.1007/s00158-006-0033-y10.1007/s00158-006-0033-y ↗
17. 10.2514/1.1400610.2514/1.14006 ↗
18. 10.1115/GT2014-2527710.1115/GT2014-25277 ↗
19. 10.3390/ijtpp201000110.3390/ijtpp2010001 ↗
20. 10.2514/6.2006-701810.2514/6.2006-7018 ↗
21. Verstraete T · Multidisciplinary optimization of a radial compressor for micro gas turbine applications · 2007
22. 10.2514/6.2000-166410.2514/6.2000-1664 ↗