Modeling, heat dissipation design, and force tracking control for temperature-dependent hysteresis of magnetorheological damper
Source abstract
Abstract
The temperature-dependence (T-dependence) characteristics of magnetorheological fluids (MRFs) cause the damping force of magnetorheological dampers (MRDs) to change with temperature. The rapid temperature rise can lead to performance degradation or even failure of MRFs, reduced damping force of MRDs, and decline in control performance. In this paper, numerical simulations and predictions of the temperature rise characteristics of the MRD are performed and heat sinks are designed and optimized. The experimental results verify the efficiency of the simulations and predictions, and the heat sinks can significantly reduce the rate of temperature increase and improve the ability of the damper to operate for long hours. In order to accurately compensate for T-dependence characteristics of the MRD, a T-dependence hysteresis model and a model-based feedforward force tracking control method with disturbance observation of the MRD are proposed and validated by experiments. The experimental results indicate that the proposed T-dependence model has better prediction accuracy than the general hysteresis model, and the feedforward control method achieves good force tracking performance even without expensive force sensors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Launch Dynamics, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/1361-665X/aac23710.1088/1361-665X/aac237 ↗
2. 10.1002/msd2.1201810.1002/msd2.12018 ↗
3. Chen S · Advances in Materials Science and Engineering · 2015 · 583076
4. Choi S · Acta Mechanica · 2015 · 73
5. 10.1122/1.55022110.1122/1.550221 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.16610910.1016/j.jmmm.2019.166109 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11831-009-9031-810.1007/s11831-009-9031-8 ↗
8. 10.1177/107754632095929010.1177/1077546320959290 ↗
9. 10.1109/MCS.2008.92942510.1109/MCS.2008.929425 ↗
10. 10.1177/1045389X1770520310.1177/1045389X17705203 ↗
11. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/5/00510.1088/0964-1726/13/5/005 ↗
12. 10.1177/026309231667638910.1177/0263092316676389 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2013.10.00910.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2013.10.009 ↗
14. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/1/01502110.1088/0964-1726/23/1/015021 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.491862810.1063/1.4918628 ↗
16. 10.1080/1042691090336741010.1080/10426910903367410 ↗
17. Tang L · Functional Materials · 2011 · 42 · 1065
18. 10.1177/095440621562109910.1177/0954406215621099 ↗
19. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/2/02300110.1088/0964-1726/20/2/023001 ↗
20. Xia F · Noise and Vibration Control · 2020 · 40 · 253
21. 10.1177/1045389X0809966010.1177/1045389X08099660 ↗
22. Yu J · Frontiers in Materials · 2019 · 6 · 1
23. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa87d610.1088/1361-665X/aa87d6 ↗
24. 10.1155/2014/40542110.1155/2014/405421 ↗