Multi-objective optimization of a morphing structure incorporating shape memory alloy actuators
Source abstract
Abstract
Morphing technology aims to improve the performance of structural components by drastically altering their shape in response to conflicting operational requirements. Thus, achieving the optimum operation of morphing structures is a rather challenging task which includes non-linear effects associated with the large deformations and rigid body motions, the actuator performance and the interactions between active and passive components. In this paper a formal optimization procedure is developed to provide the optimal design of a morphing structure with shape memory alloy actuators. The optimization of the morphing structure is formulated as a multi-objective problem aiming to concurrently optimize the passive structural components and the actuators. Subsequently, a multi-level optimization scheme is presented and implemented. Case studies prove the capability of the multi-objective optimization framework to produce robust designs of the morphing structure that simultaneously improve all performance metrics. Furthermore, it is illustrated that the proposed multi-level optimization scheme may produce similar optimal designs, compared with the conventional aggregate optimization scheme, but with significant computational gains.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
2. 10.1177/1045389X1142867210.1177/1045389X11428672 ↗
3. 10.1177/1045389X0933757310.1177/1045389X09337573 ↗
4. 10.1007/s40830-019-00260-310.1007/s40830-019-00260-3 ↗
5. 10.1117/12.77650210.1117/12.776502 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0749-6419(96)00031-910.1016/S0749-6419(96)00031-9 ↗
7. 10.1177/1045389X930040021310.1177/1045389X9300400213 ↗
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/6/2/00210.1088/0964-1726/6/2/002 ↗
9. 10.1177/1045389X1243673810.1177/1045389X12436738 ↗
10. 10.1177/095440701349655710.1177/0954407013496557 ↗
11. 10.2514/6.2012-160910.2514/6.2012-1609 ↗
12. 10.1108/0264440051061954910.1108/02644400510619549 ↗
13. 10.1115/DETC2002/MECH-3421210.1115/DETC2002/MECH-34212 ↗
14. 10.2514/1.3901610.2514/1.39016 ↗
15. 10.2514/1.2447610.2514/1.24476 ↗
16. 10.2514/6.2001-110710.2514/6.2001-1107 ↗
17. 10.1117/12.71576410.1117/12.715764 ↗
18. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/9/09400610.1088/0964-1726/20/9/094006 ↗
19. 10.1243/09544100JAERO21110.1243/09544100JAERO211 ↗
20. 10.1088/1361-665X/aafcd910.1088/1361-665X/aafcd9 ↗
21. 10.1002/we.231110.1002/we.2311 ↗
22. Konh B · 2014 · 8
23. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.10.00910.1016/j.ijplas.2011.10.009 ↗
24. Lagoudas DC · Shape Memory Alloys: Modeling and Engineering Applications · 2008
25. Langelaar M · Spie · 2007 · 6525
26. 10.2514/6.2007-174410.2514/6.2007-1744 ↗
27. 10.2514/6.2015-073110.2514/6.2015-0731 ↗
28. 10.1177/1045389X970080040210.1177/1045389X9700800402 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00024-210.1016/S0022-5096(01)00024-2 ↗
30. Machairas T · 2014
31. 10.1177/1045389X1986236210.1177/1045389X19862362 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00158-009-0460-710.1007/s00158-009-0460-7 ↗
33. 10.2514/1.1280210.2514/1.12802 ↗
34. 10.2514/1.J05271510.2514/1.J052715 ↗
35. 10.1177/1045389X1141408910.1177/1045389X11414089 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ast.2014.10.01910.1016/j.ast.2014.10.019 ↗
37. Nocedal J, Wright SJ (1999) Numerical Optimization, Second Edition , Springer, USA.10.1007/b98874 ↗
38. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/9/09401610.1088/0964-1726/21/9/094016 ↗
39. Otsuka K · Shape Memory Materials · 1998
40. Ozbulut OE, Roschke P (2008) Optimization of Multiple Shape Memory Alloy Devices by A Genetic Algorithm for Seismic Response of a Tall Structure. In: 18th Analysis and Computation Specialty Conference at Structures Congress , 24–26 April, 2008, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada, pp. 1–10.10.1061/41000(315)20 ↗
41. 10.1115/1.402538210.1115/1.4025382 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.02.03310.1016/j.msea.2015.02.033 ↗
43. Rao SS · 1999
44. Rouchon JF · 2018
45. 10.2514/6.2000-196110.2514/6.2000-1961 ↗
46. 10.1007/BF0202208710.1007/BF02022087 ↗
47. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa688c10.1088/1361-665X/aa688c ↗
48. 10.1177/1045389X1452646210.1177/1045389X14526462 ↗
49. 10.1177/1045389X1662957210.1177/1045389X16629572 ↗
50. Tanaka K · Res Mechanica: International Journal of Structural Mechanics and Materials Science · 1986 · 18 · 251
51. 10.1117/12.54001310.1117/12.540013 ↗
52. Turner TL, Buehrle RD, Cano RJ, et al. (2006) Modeling, fabrication, and testing of a SMA Hybrid Composite Jet Engine Chevron Concept. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 17(6): 483–497.10.1177/1045389X06058795 ↗
53. Woods BK, Friswell MI (2016) Multi-objective geometry optimization of the Fish Bone Active Camber morphing airfoil. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 27(6): 808–819.10.1177/1045389X15604231 ↗
54. 10.1109/TAC.1963.110551110.1109/TAC.1963.1105511 ↗