journal article·2021-07

Viscoelastic behavior of epoxy resin reinforced with shape-memory-alloy wires

Niloufar Bagheri, Mahmood M Shokrieh, Ali Saeedi

Publisher page

Abstract

The effect of NiTi alloy long wires on the viscoelastic behavior of epoxy resin was investigated by utilizing the dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and a novel micromechanical model. The present model is capable of predicting the viscoelastic properties of the shape-memory-alloy (SMA) reinforced polymer as a function of the SMA volume fraction, initial martensite volume fraction, pre-strain level in wires, and the temperature variations. The model was verified by conducting experiments. Good agreement between the theoretical and experimental results was achieved. A parametric study was also performed to investigate the effect of SMA parameters. According to the results, by the addition of a small volume fraction of SMA, the storage modulus of the composite increases significantly, especially at higher temperatures. Moreover, applying a 4% pre-strain caused a 10% increase in the maximum value of the loss factor of the SMA reinforced epoxy in comparison with the 0% pre-strained SMA reinforced epoxy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Polymer composites and self-healing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Composites Research Laboratory, Center of Excellence in Experimental Solid Mechanics and Dynamics, School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1139/l07-03810.1139/l07-038 ↗
2. ASTM · 2008
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.02510.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.025 ↗
4. Cakmak UD · arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.11079 · 2017
5. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.03.14810.1016/j.jallcom.2009.03.148 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00053-210.1016/S0263-8223(00)00053-2 ↗
7. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.643.3710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.643.37 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10710010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107100 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10773010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107730 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.04.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2004.04.004 ↗
11. 10.1155/2014/16278110.1155/2014/162781 ↗
12. 10.1007/s13726-012-0069-310.1007/s13726-012-0069-3 ↗
13. 10.1080/02670836.2019.166899810.1080/02670836.2019.1668998 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.007 ↗
15. 10.1080/15376494.2016.114203110.1080/15376494.2016.1142031 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2456910.1002/pc.24569 ↗
17. 10.1017/CBO978051162672210.1017/CBO9780511626722 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00707-015-1433-010.1007/s00707-015-1433-0 ↗
19. 10.1177/1045389X970080040210.1177/1045389X9700800402 ↗
20. 10.1177/073168441351595510.1177/0731684413515955 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.09.01610.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.09.016 ↗
22. Mohaseb Karimlou M · Modares Mechanical Engineering · 2018 · 17 · 429
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.02.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2006.02.009 ↗
24. 10.3390/s709188710.3390/s7091887 ↗
25. Pan Q · 2008 · 1
26. 10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.02.00510.1016/j.ctmat.2016.02.005 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.10.00910.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.10.009 ↗
28. 10.1177/1045389X1984401510.1177/1045389X19844015 ↗
29. 10.1590/sajs.2014/2013020010.1590/sajs.2014/20130200 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.10.00610.1016/j.commatsci.2017.10.006 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apm.2016.11.02810.1016/j.apm.2016.11.028 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.04210.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.042 ↗
33. 10.1177/002199830809632310.1177/0021998308096323 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2015.05.00810.1016/j.ijengsci.2015.05.008 ↗
35. Van Humbeeck J · Le Journal de Physique IV · 1996 · 6
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.11.03210.1016/j.compstruct.2005.11.032 ↗