Design and experimental evaluation of a novel flow-mode magnetorheological damper without accumulator
Source abstract
Abstract
Researchers in the field of vibration control have shown increasing interest in magneto-rheological dampers (MRDs) in recent years. Conventional flow-mode MRDs typically employ a gas chamber as an accumulator to accommodate volume changes and promote fluid communication. However, this approach introduces manufacturing complexities and raises production costs. To overcome these challenges, we propose a novel configuration for flow-mode MRDs that replaces the accumulator with a structural constraint. This modification leads to a more compact and cost-effective MRD solution suitable for engineering applications. This paper presents an introduction, followed by the configuration and design of the novel MRD for a case study involving a vehicle suspension system. To enhance output performance, we optimize the significant geometry of the damper using the finite element method (FEM), taking into account the damping force, off-state force, and inductive time constant of the damper. Based on the optimal simulation results, we provide a detailed design of the optimized flow-mode MRD without an accumulator for prototype fabrication. To assess the practical performance of the proposed MRD prototype, we conducted experiments on a test rig and engaged in comprehensive discussions based on the obtained results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Institute of Engineering, HUTECH University, Ho Chi Minh City,Vietnam
Faculty of Engineering, Vietnamese-German University, Ben Cat Town, Binh Duong Province, Vietnam
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.03910.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.039 ↗
2. ANSYS Inc · 2013
3. ANSYS Inc · 2021
4. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.07.05010.1016/j.ymssp.2018.07.050 ↗
5. 10.1109/TMAG.2013.224140210.1109/TMAG.2013.2241402 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11285510.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112855 ↗
7. 10.1007/978-3-030-91892-7_7110.1007/978-3-030-91892-7_71 ↗
8. 10.1088/1361-665X/abdc0910.1088/1361-665X/abdc09 ↗
9. 10.3390/app1012409910.3390/app10124099 ↗
10. 10.1109/4235.99601710.1109/4235.996017 ↗
11. Delivorias RP · 2004
12. 10.1177/1464419322109086810.1177/14644193221090868 ↗
13. 10.1177/0954407021103631710.1177/09544070211036317 ↗
14. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab859e10.1088/1361-665X/ab859e ↗
15. 10.1177/1045389X1986263910.1177/1045389X19862639 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.sna.2022.11398310.1016/j.sna.2022.113983 ↗
17. 10.1106/412A-2GMA-BTUL-MALT10.1106/412A-2GMA-BTUL-MALT ↗
18. 10.1177/1045389X2199391210.1177/1045389X21993912 ↗
19. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/3/03501210.1088/0964-1726/18/3/035012 ↗
20. 10.1177/1045389X2098392010.1177/1045389X20983920 ↗
21. Parker’s O-ring Division · 2007
22. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac586010.1088/1361-665X/ac5860 ↗
23. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/3/03501310.1088/0964-1726/24/3/035013 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:3(230)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:3(230) ↗
25. Stein ML · 2012
26. 10.1007/s12206-018-0308-410.1007/s12206-018-0308-4 ↗
27. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/2/02300110.1088/0964-1726/20/2/023001 ↗
28. 10.1177/1045389X22111749510.1177/1045389X221117495 ↗
29. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac701a10.1088/1361-665X/ac701a ↗