Localization of multiple acoustic emission events occurring closely in time in thin-walled pipes using sparse reconstruction
Source abstract
Abstract
A sparse reconstruction approach capable of localizing multiple acoustic emission events is proposed. The approach is specifically designed for localizing events that occur closely in time, where triangulation methods can fail. To perform localization, the approach uses information contained in the entire length of acoustic emission signals and is implemented using the matching pursuit algorithm. Implementation is considered theoretically for large-diameter thin-walled pipes. The approach is validated on experimental data of simulated acoustic emission events in a thin-walled pipe. The experimental data correspond to helical guided ultrasonic waves generated by standard pencil lead breaks (Hsu-Nielsen sources) on its outer surface. The acoustic emission signals are recorded by sparsely distributed low-profile piezoelectric transducers instrumented on the outer surface. Experimental examples are presented for the failure of the triangulation method when multiple sources are present while highlighting the capabilities of the proposed technique. It is demonstrated that the approach possesses the ability of localizing multiple events occurring closely in time. An example is also presented for the localization of a more commonly encountered isolated acoustic emission event.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Smart Structures Research Group (SSRG), University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
Funding
Exxonmobil Research and Engineering Co.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Abramowitz M · 1972
2. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.05.00310.1016/j.ymssp.2006.05.003 ↗
3. 10.1137/S106482759630401010.1137/S1064827596304010 ↗
4. 10.1088/0964-1726/12/5/01710.1088/0964-1726/12/5/017 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ultras.2009.11.00210.1016/j.ultras.2009.11.002 ↗
6. 10.1109/TUFFC.2010.174710.1109/TUFFC.2010.1747 ↗
7. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/3/03500910.1088/0964-1726/21/3/035009 ↗
8. 10.1177/147592171454893710.1177/1475921714548937 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.02.00410.1016/j.ymssp.2015.02.004 ↗
10. Ditri JJ · Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation · 1994 · 13 · 133
11. 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.11.01310.1016/j.ultras.2016.11.013 ↗
12. Dubuc B · 2017 · 10168
13. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.07.00810.1016/j.ndteint.2017.07.008 ↗
14. 10.1121/1.40125810.1121/1.401258 ↗
15. Graff KF · 1975
16. 10.1109/JPROC.2015.248143810.1109/JPROC.2015.2481438 ↗
17. 10.1121/1.486365110.1121/1.4863651 ↗
18. 10.1109/TUFFC.2014.00686010.1109/TUFFC.2014.006860 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.05.01810.1016/j.ymssp.2009.05.018 ↗
20. 10.1088/0964-1726/14/4/01310.1088/0964-1726/14/4/013 ↗
21. Hsu NN (1976) Acoustic emission simulator. Patent 4018084, USA.
22. 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.07.01710.1016/j.ultras.2006.07.017 ↗
23. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/3/03500610.1088/0964-1726/18/3/035006 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.08.00910.1016/j.ultras.2014.08.009 ↗
25. 10.1006/mssp.1996.006610.1006/mssp.1996.0066 ↗
26. 10.1121/1.159306810.1121/1.1593068 ↗
27. 10.1121/1.478898410.1121/1.4788984 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ultras.2005.07.00210.1016/j.ultras.2005.07.002 ↗
29. 10.1109/TUFFC.2008.62610.1109/TUFFC.2008.626 ↗
30. 10.1109/78.25808210.1109/78.258082 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.01.01710.1016/j.ultras.2014.01.017 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.03.00110.1016/j.ultras.2014.03.001 ↗
33. 10.1201/978020391106810.1201/9780203911068 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.50310.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.503 ↗
35. 10.1016/0029-1021(76)90027-X10.1016/0029-1021(76)90027-X ↗
36. Wilcox PD (1998) Lamb wave inspection of large structures using permanently attached transducers. PhD Thesis, Imperial College London, London.