A unified formulation for predictive modeling of guided-ultrasonic wave dispersion curves in metallic and composite materials
Source abstract
Abstract
To predict dispersion curves it is common to use different solution approaches depending on the material type, isotropic or composite, of the medium in which the wave propagates. The two different solution methods are defined in different domains, frequency–wavespeed domain for isotropic materials, and wavenumber–wavespeed domain for composites which can lead to difficulties, and unsatisfying results when predicting the dispersion curves for hybrid laminates which contain both isotropic and composite materials. This article, therefore, proposes a unified formulation defined in the wavenumber–wavespeed domain for both isotropic and composite materials. The unified formulation, simple, and mathematically straightforward formulation, utilizes Christoffel’s equation for a lamina to obtain the eigenvalues and eigenvectors. The eigenvalues and eigenvectors are then used to set up the field matrix from which the dispersion curves could be retrieved. Once the dispersion curves were obtained the waves are grouped using a modeshape analysis. A spline algorithm is applied to obtain a continuous solution from a rough domain which was used to reduce computational time. In addition, this article highlights the challenges faced in the numerical process, and provides a discussions of the methods used to overcome these obstacles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Numerical methods in engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
Funding
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Russia · National Aeronautics and Space Administration
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Abdelrahman AK (2014) Ultrasonic transduction in metallic and composite structures for structural health monitoring using extensional and shear horizontal piezoelectric wafer active sensors. PhD Thesis, University of South Carolina, USA.
2. Abramowitz M · 1972 · 9
3. 10.1155/2014/10940310.1155/2014/109403 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.02110.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.021 ↗
5. Calomfirescu M. (2008) Lamb waves for structural health monitoring in viscoelastic composite materials. PhD Thesis, Universität Bremen, Germany.
6. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.05.00110.1016/j.paerosci.2010.05.001 ↗
7. 10.1117/12.47071510.1117/12.470715 ↗
8. 10.1177/058310240505256110.1177/0583102405052561 ↗
9. Giurgiutiu V · 2016
10. Giurgiutiu V · 2014
11. Haskell NA · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America · 1953 · 43 · 1710.1785/BSSA0430010017 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/11/2/31010.1088/0964-1726/11/2/310 ↗
13. 10.1785/BSSA054001043110.1785/BSSA0540010431 ↗
14. 10.1098/rspa.1917.000810.1098/rspa.1917.0008 ↗
15. Lowe M · IEEE Transactions · 1995 · 42 · 525
16. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/4/04502210.1088/0964-1726/19/4/045022 ↗
17. Nayfeh A · 1995
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.01.03410.1016/j.compstruct.2014.01.034 ↗
19. Pavlakovic B · Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE · 1997 · 16 · 186
20. Pavlakovic B, Lowe M (2003) Disperse – a system for generating dispersion curves, version 2.0.16b.
21. 10.1177/058310240607542810.1177/0583102406075428 ↗
22. 10.1121/1.149736510.1121/1.1497365 ↗
23. Rokhlin S · 2011
24. Rose J · 1999
25. Staszewski WJ · 2004
26. 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.02010.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.020 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.169962910.1063/1.1699629 ↗
28. 10.1007/978-1-4899-5681-110.1007/978-1-4899-5681-1 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0041-624X(01)00082-810.1016/S0041-624X(01)00082-8 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.09.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2006.09.023 ↗