Sub-nanometer active seismic isolator control
Source abstract
Abstract
Ambitious projects such as the design of the future Compact Linear Collider require challenging parameters and technologies. Stabilization of the Compact Linear Collider particle beam is one of these challenges. Ground motion is the main source of beam misalignment. Beam dynamics controls are, however, efficient only at low frequency (<4 Hz), due to the sampling of the beam at 50 Hz. Hence, ground motion mitigation techniques such as active stabilization are required. This article shows a dedicated prototype able to manage vibration at a sub-nanometer scale. The use of cutting edge sensor technology is, however, very challenging for control applications as they are usually used for measurement purposes. Limiting factors such as sensor dynamics and noise lead to a performance optimization problem. The current state of the art in ground motion measurement and ground motion mitigation techniques is pointed out and shows limits of the technologies. The proposed active device is then described, and a realistic model of the process has been established. A dedicated controller design combining feedforward and feedback techniques is presented, and theoretical results in terms of power spectral density of displacement are compared to real-time experimental results obtained with a rapid control prototyping tool.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysics and Sensor Technology · Seismic Waves and Analysis · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratoire d’Annecy-Le-Vieux de Physique des Particules (LAPP-IN2P3-CNRS), Université de Savoie, Annecy-le-Vieux CEDEX, France
Laboratoire SYstèmes et Matériaux pour la MEcatronique (SYMME), Polytech’Annecy Chambéry, Université de Savoie, Annecy-le-Vieux CEDEX, France
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Artoos K, Collette C, Esposito M, (2011) Modal analysis and measurement of water cooling induced vibrations on a CLIC main beam quadrupole prototype. In: Proceedings of international particle accelerator conference (IPAC 2011), San Sebastián, Spain, September 2011. Available at: http://www.ipac-2011.org/inicio.asp
2. Balik G, Badel A, Bolzon B, (2010) Stabilization study at the sub-nanometer level at the interaction point of the future Compact Linear Collider. In: Proceedings of mechatronics (MECHATRONICS 2010), Yokohama, Japan, November 2010. Available at: http://eam2010.sd.keio.ac.jp/
3. Balik G, Brunetti L, Deleglise G, (2011) Interaction point feedback design and integrated simulations to stabilize the CLIC final focus. In: Proceedings of international particle accelerator conference (IPAC 2011), San Sebastian, Spain, September 2011. Available at: http://www.ipac-2011.org/inicio.asp
4. Caron B, Balik G, Brunetti L, (2012) Vibration control of the beam of the future linear collider. Control Engineering Practice 20(3): 236–247. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S096706611100233410.1016/j.conengprac.2011.11.001 ↗
5. 10.5170/CERN-2012-00710.5170/CERN-2012-007 ↗
6. Collette C, Janssens S, Artoos K, (2011) Nano-motion control of heavy quadrupoles for future particle colliders: an experimental validation. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 643(1): 95–101. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016890021100766210.1016/j.nima.2011.04.028 ↗
7. Frisch J · 2004 · 684
8. Frisch J · 2004 · 681
9. Gaddi A, Gerwig H, Ramos F, (2012) Mechanical design of a pre-isolator for the CLIC final focusing magnets.
10. Goodwin GC, Middleton RH, Poor HV (1992) High-speed digital signal processing and control. Proceedings of the IEEE 80(2): 240–259. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel1/5/3491/00123294.pdf?arnumber=12329410.1109/5.123294 ↗
11. Janssens S · 2011 · 74
12. Montag C (1996) Active stabilization of mechanical quadrupole vibrations for linear colliders. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 378(3): 369–375. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016890029600451210.1016/0168-9002(96)00451-2 ↗
13. Pfingstner J, Schulte D, Hofbaur M (2011) SVD-based filter design for the trajectory feedback of CLIC. In: IPAC 2011, the second international particle accelerator conference, San Sebastián, Spain, pp. 511–513. Available at: http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/AccelConf/IPAC2011/papers/mopo014.pdf
14. 10.1006/jsvi.2002.504710.1006/jsvi.2002.5047 ↗
15. Sarajlic E, Berenschot JW, Krijnen GJM, (2003) Low volume, large force (>1 mN) and nanometer resolution, electrostatic microactuator for low displacement applications. In: Nanotech 2003. Available at: http://doc.utwente.nl/46519/1/Sarajlic03low.pdf
16. The CMS Collaboration (2008) The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC. Journal of Instrumentation 3(8): S08004. Available at: http://stacks.iop.org/1748-0221/3/i=08/a=S08004?key=crossref.fc7f4422618a075830e017d1d930a35c
17. Adolphsen C, Aiello R, Alley R, (1996) Zeroth-order design report for the next linear collider (Ground motion: theory and measurement). Report, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, May, pp. 1005–1035. Available at: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/pubs/slacreports/slac-r-474.html
18. Tjepkema D, van Dijk J, Soemers HMJR (2012) Sensor fusion for active vibration isolation in precision equipment. Journal of Sound and Vibration 331(4): 735–749. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022460X1100765610.1016/j.jsv.2011.09.022 ↗
19. Virdee TS (2010) The LHC project: the accelerator and the experiments. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 623(1): 1–10. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016890021000409210.1016/j.nima.2010.02.142 ↗