A Non-linear Optimal Control Design using Narrowband Perturbation Feedback for Magnetostrictive Actuators
Source abstract
Abstract
Non-linear optimal and narrowband feedback control designs are developed and experimentally implemented on a magnetostrictive Terfenol-D actuator. The non-linear optimal control design incorporates a non-linear and hysteretic ferromagnetic homogenized energy model within an optimal control formulation to reduce displacement tracking errors and increase bandwidth. Improvements in robustness in the steady-state regime are achieved by utilizing narrowband feedback. A narrowband filter is implemented by treating the nonlinear and hysteretic magnetostrictive constitutive behavior as higher-order harmonic disturbances which are mitigated by tuning the narrowband filter to penalize these harmonics for displacement tracking control problems. The control designs are then combined into a hybrid optimal controller with perturbation narrowband feedback. Both transient and steady-state tracking control is assessed to illustrate performance attributes in different operating regimes. Narrowband perturbation feedback is shown to mitigate errors in the steady-state operating regime, while non-linear optimal control provides enhanced tracking control in the transient regime. The hybrid control design is relevant to a broad number of smart material actuators that exhibit non-linear and hysteretic field-coupled constitutive behavior.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Piezoelectric Actuators and Control · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2870, USA,
ETREMA Products, Inc., Ames, IA 50010, USA
Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TMECH.2008.200650110.1109/TMECH.2008.2006501 ↗
2. Bay, J. · 1999
3. Cheng, R. · NASA Technical Report, vol. NASA/TP · 2006 · 1
4. Clarke, D. · I. The Basic Algorithm,’’ Automatica · 1987 · 23 · 137
5. 10.1115/1.134119710.1115/1.1341197 ↗
6. 10.1109/87.49119510.1109/87.491195 ↗
7. 10.2514/3.2108510.2514/3.21085 ↗
8. Henson, M. · Chem. Eng. · 1998 · 23 · 187
9. 10.1002/978047051320010.1002/9780470513200 ↗
10. 10.1109/MCS.2008.93092410.1109/MCS.2008.930924 ↗
11. 10.1109/TAC.2005.84920510.1109/TAC.2005.849205 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0924-4247(99)00215-010.1016/S0924-4247(99)00215-0 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.220.4598.67110.1126/science.220.4598.671 ↗
14. Lewis, F. · 1995
15. Lovera, M.
16. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1239(19980415/30)8:4/5<401::AID-RNC361>3.0.CO;2-U10.1002/(SICI)1099-1239(19980415/30)8:4/5<401::AID-RNC361>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
17. Natale, C.
18. 10.1115/1.308956010.1115/1.3089560 ↗
19. 10.1115/1.307209310.1115/1.3072093 ↗
20. 10.1109/78.15728310.1109/78.157283 ↗
21. 10.1137/1.978089871747110.1137/1.9780898717471 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.08.00610.1016/j.jmps.2005.08.006 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.automatica.2004.04.00610.1016/j.automatica.2004.04.006 ↗
24. 10.1109/9.34177810.1109/9.341778 ↗
25. Tian, Y.