journal article·2022-03

Reliability and reliability-based sensitivity analysis of self-centering buckling restrained braces using meta-models

Seyede Vahide Hashemi, Mahmoud Miri, Mohsen Rashki, Sadegh Etedali

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper aims to carry out sensitivity analyses to study how the effect of each design variable on the performance of self-centering buckling restrained brace (SC-BRB) and the corresponding buckling restrained brace (BRB) without shape memory alloy (SMA) rods. Furthermore, the reliability analyses of BRB and SC-BRB are performed in this study. Considering the high computational cost of the simulation methods, three Meta-models including the Kriging, radial basis function (RBF), and polynomial response surface (PRSM) are utilized to construct the surrogate models. For this aim, the nonlinear dynamic analyses are conducted on both BRB and SC-BRB by using OpenSees software. The results showed that the SMA area, SMA length ratio, and BRB core area have the most effect on the failure probability of SC-BRB. It is concluded that Kriging-based Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) gives the best performance to estimate the limit state function (LSF) of BRB and SC-BRB in the reliability analysis procedures. Considering the effects of changing the maximum cyclic loading on the failure probability computation and comparison of the failure probability for different LSFs, it is also found that the reliability indices of SC-BRB were always higher than the corresponding reliability indices determined for BRB which confirms the performance superiority of SC-BRB than BRB.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

Department of Architectural Engineering, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

Department of Civil Engineering, Birjand University of Technology, Birjand, Iran

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa6abc10.1088/1361-665X/aa6abc ↗
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.000024710.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000247 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ress.2014.01.00310.1016/j.ress.2014.01.003 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11803-009-9013-810.1007/s11803-009-9013-8 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.11384210.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113842 ↗
6. 10.1177/1045389X2097791310.1177/1045389X20977913 ↗
7. 10.1142/S021945541250037X10.1142/S021945541250037X ↗
8. 10.2307/300166310.2307/3001663 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2007.03.01510.1016/j.advengsoft.2007.03.015 ↗
10. CEN Code (1993) European committee for standardization. Available at: www.cen.eu
11. 10.1016/j.probengmech.2010.07.00710.1016/j.probengmech.2010.07.007 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10518-017-0169-810.1007/s10518-017-0169-8 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00098-010.1016/S0141-0296(01)00098-0 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(38)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(38) ↗
15. 10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.08.01010.1016/j.strusafe.2013.08.010 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.probengmech.2013.02.00210.1016/j.probengmech.2013.02.002 ↗
17. 10.1002/eqe.242810.1002/eqe.2428 ↗
18. 10.1080/0305215050042229410.1080/03052150500422294 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.10632110.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106321 ↗
20. 10.1002/eqe.109810.1002/eqe.1098 ↗
21. 10.18820/978192068934610.18820/9781920689346 ↗
22. JPM Code (2001) Joint committee on structural safety. Available at: www.jcss-lc.org/
23. Kamgar R · International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering · 2019 · 9 · 671
24. 10.1177/1045389X1982850210.1177/1045389X19828502 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.strusafe.2004.09.00110.1016/j.strusafe.2004.09.001 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apm.2017.12.03010.1016/j.apm.2017.12.030 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0169-7161(96)13011-X10.1016/S0169-7161(96)13011-X ↗
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000000810.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000008 ↗
29. Mazzoni S · 2007
30. 10.1080/01621459.1949.1048331010.1080/01621459.1949.10483310 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.03710.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.037 ↗
32. 10.1193/1.158577810.1193/1.1585778 ↗
33. 10.1177/1045389X1988878610.1177/1045389X19888786 ↗
34. Mitchell TJ · Statistica Sinica · 1992 · 2 · 359
35. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.10613710.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106137 ↗
36. 10.1002/tal.166610.1002/tal.1666 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ress.2020.10686010.1016/j.ress.2020.106860 ↗
38. 10.1201/b1291310.1201/b12913 ↗
39. 10.1177/1045389X1141122010.1177/1045389X11411220 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.07.00810.1016/j.jcsr.2017.07.008 ↗
41. 10.2478/ceer-2020-000110.2478/ceer-2020-0001 ↗
42. 10.1155/2013/64392710.1155/2013/643927 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10262310.1016/j.jobe.2021.102623 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.apm.2018.03.00910.1016/j.apm.2018.03.009 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.10186910.1016/j.strusafe.2019.101869 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.06.00310.1016/j.strusafe.2012.06.003 ↗
47. 10.12989/scs.2012.12.3.23110.12989/scs.2012.12.3.231 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.probengmech.2012.10.00110.1016/j.probengmech.2012.10.001 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.06510.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.065 ↗
50. 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.57.1210.3221/IGF-ESIS.57.12 ↗
51. 10.1007/s10518-018-0415-810.1007/s10518-018-0415-8 ↗
52. 10.12989/sem.2014.51.3.48710.12989/sem.2014.51.3.487 ↗
53. 10.3850/978-981-07-2219-7_P32110.3850/978-981-07-2219-7_P321 ↗
54. Taftali B · 2007
55. 10.1139/l05-10310.1139/l05-103 ↗
56. Uang CM · Steel Structures · 2004 · 4 · 301
57. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.11.01610.1016/j.ymssp.2015.11.016 ↗
58. 10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00136-910.1016/S0141-0296(98)00136-9 ↗
59. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000056510.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000565 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.apm.2014.11.04510.1016/j.apm.2014.11.045 ↗