journal article·2021-09

Effect of shape factor on compression mode dynamic properties of magnetorheological elastomers

Hossein Vatandoost, Masoud Hemmatian, Ramin Sedaghati, Subhash Rakheja

Publisher page

Abstract

The present study investigates the effects of shape factor (SF) on compression mode properties of cylindrical isotropic and anisotropic MREs. MRE samples with different SFs were fabricated and an experimental set up was designed to measure their magneto-mechanical responses. Extensive experimental characterizations of both kinds of MREs under wide ranges of excitation (strain-rate and amplitude) and applied magnetic field were conducted to realize the effect of SF on their compression mode dynamic properties, and also to identify the coupling effect between SF and loading conditions. Moreover, practical models have been proposed to accurately predict compression elastic and loss moduli of both MREs as a function of SF, strain-rate, amplitude and magnetic flux density. Results revealed maximum SF-stiffening effect of up to 77% and 111% for the compression elastic modulus of the isotropic and anisotropic MREs, respectively, when SF was increased from 0.375 to 0.75. The respective maximum SF effects on the loss factor were obtained as 120% and 49%. Results also generally show nonlinear effects of the SF on both the off- and on-state MRE properties and increasing the SF can enhance the relative MR effect in terms of both the elastic modulus and the loss factor of both MREs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Aerospace Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/1045389X1351731010.1177/1045389X13517310 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.01.01110.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.01.011 ↗
3. 10.1177/1045389X1875435010.1177/1045389X18754350 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.06010.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.060 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2013.02.00310.1016/j.ijengsci.2013.02.003 ↗
6. ASTM · ASTM International · 2008
7. 10.1142/S021797920201249910.1142/S0217979202012499 ↗
8. 10.1177/1045389X1982882810.1177/1045389X19828828 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.02610.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.026 ↗
10. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/5/04910.1088/0964-1726/16/5/049 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00419-018-1456-910.1007/s00419-018-1456-9 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.12.00310.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.12.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.08010.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.080 ↗
14. 10.1006/jsvi.1999.285710.1006/jsvi.1999.2857 ↗
15. Diguet G · 2010
16. 10.1016/S0142-9418(03)00103-X10.1016/S0142-9418(03)00103-X ↗
17. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.09.00710.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.09.007 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.3153310.1002/app.31533 ↗
19. 10.1002/app.2434810.1002/app.24348 ↗
20. 10.1039/c2ra22824f10.1039/c2ra22824f ↗
21. 10.1177/1045389X1244828610.1177/1045389X12448286 ↗
22. Guelho I · 2011
23. 10.1063/1.492771410.1063/1.4927714 ↗
24. 10.1109/TMAG.2009.202488610.1109/TMAG.2009.2024886 ↗
25. ISO · International Organization for Standardization · 2011
26. ISO (2017) ISO 7743: 2017: Rubber, Vulcanized or Thermoplastic. Determination of Compression Stress-strain Properties . International Organization for Standardization.
27. 10.1039/C3SM52440J10.1039/C3SM52440J ↗
28. 10.1177/1045389X2094231410.1177/1045389X20942314 ↗
29. Kallio M (2005) The Elastic and Damping Properties of Magnetorheological Elastomers. Finland: Tampere University of Technology, p.7.
30. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/2/03210.1088/0964-1726/16/2/032 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10731110.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107311 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.03310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.033 ↗
33. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/11/11700210.1088/0964-1726/19/11/117002 ↗
34. 10.1002/pat.454410.1002/pat.4544 ↗
35. 10.1177/1045389X0707785010.1177/1045389X07077850 ↗
36. 10.1115/1.402383910.1115/1.4023839 ↗
37. 10.1021/ie400864d10.1021/ie400864d ↗
38. 10.1021/ie201976e10.1021/ie201976e ↗
39. 10.2514/6.2017-073310.2514/6.2017-0733 ↗
40. 10.1109/TMAG.2017.269840310.1109/TMAG.2017.2698403 ↗
41. 10.1177/1045389X1561596610.1177/1045389X15615966 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2017.05.00910.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2017.05.009 ↗
43. 10.1155/2017/860541310.1155/2017/8605413 ↗
44. 10.1109/TMAG.2010.204475910.1109/TMAG.2010.2044759 ↗
45. 10.1038/1771174a010.1038/1771174a0 ↗
46. Payne AR · 1957
47. 10.5254/1.354737510.5254/1.3547375 ↗
48. 10.1177/1045389X0935566610.1177/1045389X09355666 ↗
49. 10.1177/1045389X1769204710.1177/1045389X17692047 ↗
50. 10.1007/s00170-017-1032-410.1007/s00170-017-1032-4 ↗
51. Sapouna K · 2018
52. 10.1088/1742-6596/149/1/01209610.1088/1742-6596/149/1/012096 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.01.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.01.008 ↗
54. 10.1002/app.1995.07058041110.1002/app.1995.070580411 ↗
55. 10.1088/1742-6596/149/1/01209710.1088/1742-6596/149/1/012097 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.02.06210.1016/j.jmmm.2012.02.062 ↗
57. Suphadon N · 2010
58. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/11/11500210.1088/0964-1726/25/11/115002 ↗
59. 10.24200/sci.2016.388510.24200/sci.2016.3885 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10764810.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107648 ↗
61. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa612610.1088/1361-665X/aa6126 ↗
62. 10.1109/TMAG.2020.303623410.1109/TMAG.2020.3036234 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10688810.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106888 ↗
64. 10.1088/1361-665X/aaeaf810.1088/1361-665X/aaeaf8 ↗
65. 10.1063/1.500726610.1063/1.5007266 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.03.02710.1016/j.jmmm.2019.03.027 ↗
67. 10.1142/S021797920704596710.1142/S0217979207045967 ↗
68. 10.1088/1361-665X/aab63e10.1088/1361-665X/aab63e ↗