Elman neural network–based identification of rate-dependent hysteresis in piezoelectric actuators
Source abstract
Abstract
Rate-dependent hysteresis nonlinearity in piezoelectric actuators severely limits micro- and nanoscale system performance. It is necessary to establish a dynamic model to describe the full behavior of rate-dependent hysteresis. In this article, the Elman neural network–based hysteresis model is developed for piezoelectric actuators. An improved dynamic hysteretic operator is proposed to transform the multi-valued mapping of hysteresis into one-to-one mapping on a newly constructed expanded input space. Then, Elman neural network incorporated with the improved dynamic hysteretic operator is utilized to approximate the behavior of rate-dependent hysteresis. The combination of Elman neural network and the improved dynamic hysteretic operator can dually embody the dynamic property and is capable of fully extracting the characteristics of rate-dependent hysteresis. The experimental results are presented to illustrate the potential of the proposed modeling technique.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Piezoelectric Actuators and Control · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Magnetic Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering & Automation, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China
School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, China
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TMECH.2012.220526510.1109/TMECH.2012.2205265 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2009.02.00810.1016/j.mechatronics.2009.02.008 ↗
3. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.284151410.1109/ACCESS.2018.2841514 ↗
4. 10.1109/TIE.2016.257327010.1109/TIE.2016.2573270 ↗
5. 10.1109/TIE.2016.264460310.1109/TIE.2016.2644603 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.sna.2007.11.02310.1016/j.sna.2007.11.023 ↗
7. 10.1177/1045389X1561091310.1177/1045389X15610913 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.sna.2010.09.02010.1016/j.sna.2010.09.020 ↗
9. 10.1109/TASE.2014.235236410.1109/TASE.2014.2352364 ↗
10. 10.1191/0142331203tm084oa10.1191/0142331203tm084oa ↗
11. 10.1049/iet-cta.2013.085610.1049/iet-cta.2013.0856 ↗
12. 10.1177/1045389X1039261010.1177/1045389X10392610 ↗
13. 10.1007/978-3-319-43506-0_5810.1007/978-3-319-43506-0_58 ↗
14. 10.1109/TFUZZ.2015.250228210.1109/TFUZZ.2015.2502282 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.10.00410.1016/j.ymssp.2012.10.004 ↗
16. 10.1109/TMECH.2018.280576110.1109/TMECH.2018.2805761 ↗
17. 10.1177/1045389X1559248110.1177/1045389X15592481 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00521-015-1950-810.1007/s00521-015-1950-8 ↗
19. 10.1109/TMECH.2002.80272410.1109/TMECH.2002.802724 ↗
20. 10.1109/TAC.2005.84703510.1109/TAC.2005.847035 ↗
21. 10.1109/TAC.2007.89236910.1109/TAC.2007.892369 ↗
22. 10.3390/mi804011410.3390/mi8040114 ↗
23. 10.1109/TCST.2018.284973510.1109/TCST.2018.2849735 ↗
24. 10.1109/TMECH.2005.84470810.1109/TMECH.2005.844708 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.automatica.2004.04.00610.1016/j.automatica.2004.04.006 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.physb.2015.04.04010.1016/j.physb.2015.04.040 ↗
27. Wang YF · IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2018 · 54 · 1
28. 10.1109/3477.86517910.1109/3477.865179 ↗
29. 10.1109/TMAG.2017.270047910.1109/TMAG.2017.2700479 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0094-114X(01)00060-X10.1016/S0094-114X(01)00060-X ↗
31. 10.1109/TNANO.2019.295393310.1109/TNANO.2019.2953933 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.sna.2009.10.00910.1016/j.sna.2009.10.009 ↗
33. Zhang XY · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2019 · 1
34. 10.1109/TSMC.2018.282710110.1109/TSMC.2018.2827101 ↗
35. 10.1109/TCYB.2018.282651910.1109/TCYB.2018.2826519 ↗
36. 10.1177/1045389X1878105110.1177/1045389X18781051 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.sna.2018.09.05010.1016/j.sna.2018.09.050 ↗