Comparison of monolithic and composite piezoelectric material–based energy harvesting devices
Source abstract
Abstract
This study presents a comparison of the energy harvesting capacity of monolithic and composite piezoelectric materials, especially in the same energy harvesting configuration. The energy harvesting device was composed of a cantilever beam with active piezoelectric materials, a full-bridge rectifier circuit and an electrical load (resistance). Two energy harvesting devices were fabricated, both of which had piezoelectric patches mounted on top and bottom of the cantilever vibrating element. The first energy harvesting device utilized PZT-5H patches as a monolithic piezoelectric material, and the second energy harvesting device used macro-fiber composite patches as a composite piezoelectric material. The vibrating element used in this study was a stainless steel cantilevered beam with the same dimension as the patch. Characteristics of the energy harvesting devices, including generated power, current, and voltage, were compared in frequency domain and evaluated with respect to the electrical load under different excitation levels. In addition, the effects of the natural frequencies of the energy harvesting devices to the harvesting performance were evaluated. The power density (i.e. power over volume) and specific power (i.e. power over mass) of the energy harvesting devices were compared. In addition, the current density (i.e. current over volume) and specific current (i.e. current over mass) were also presented. Finally, the charging and discharging performances of the energy harvesting devices were also evaluated using a polymer Li-ion battery as the electrical load.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Smart Structures Laboratory, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
InnoVital Systems, Inc., Beltsville MD, USA
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/2/02410.1088/0964-1726/16/2/024 ↗
2. 10.1088/0964-1726/10/2/31410.1088/0964-1726/10/2/314 ↗
3. 10.1177/1045389X0707896910.1177/1045389X07078969 ↗
4. Hagood NW, Chung WH, Flotow AV (1990) Modeling of piezoelectric actuator dynamics for active structural control. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 1: 327–354.
5. Hoffart F (2008) Proper care extends Li-Ion battery life. Power Electronics Technology April pp. 24–28. Available at: http://powerelectronics.com/mobile/proper-care-extends-li-ion-battery-life
6. 10.1177/1045389X0505404310.1177/1045389X05054043 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.sna.2005.10.04310.1016/j.sna.2005.10.043 ↗
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/5/03010.1088/0964-1726/15/5/030 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00210-410.1016/S0022-460X(03)00210-4 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.14110.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.141 ↗
11. 10.1109/TPEL.2002.80219410.1109/TPEL.2002.802194 ↗
12. Ramsay MJ, Clark WW (2001) Piezoelectric energy harvesting for bio-MEMS applications. In: Proceedings of the SPIE 8th smart structures and materials conference, vol. 4332, Newport Beach, CA, 4 March, pp. 429–438. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
13. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/5/01810.1088/0964-1726/13/5/018 ↗
14. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/6/00110.1088/0964-1726/15/6/001 ↗
15. 10.1177/1045389X0607275310.1177/1045389X06072753 ↗
16. 10.1177/1045389X0505668110.1177/1045389X05056681 ↗
17. 10.1177/1045389X0504721010.1177/1045389X05047210 ↗
18. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/5/00710.1088/0964-1726/15/5/007 ↗
19. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2004.00120.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2004.00120.x ↗
20. 10.1177/1045389X0934701710.1177/1045389X09347017 ↗
21. 10.1177/1045389X1036163310.1177/1045389X10361633 ↗
22. 10.1109/ISAF.2011.601413610.1109/ISAF.2011.6014136 ↗
23. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/11/11502510.1088/0964-1726/18/11/115025 ↗