Design, Fabrication, and Testing of a Scaled Wind Tunnel Model for the Smart Wing Project
Source abstract
Abstract
Building on the research performed during the DARPA/AFRL/NASA Smart Wing Phase 1 program (Kudva, J.N. et al. (July 1999). Overview of the DARPA/AFRL/NASA Smart Wing Program, SPIE Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Newport Beach, CA, Vol. 3674, pp. 230 6; Martin, C.A. et al. (1999). Smart Materials and Structures Smart Wing Phase 1 Final Report, AFRL-ML-WP-TR-1999-4162, Air Vehicles Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.) sought to improve vehicle aerodynamic efficiency using control surfaces actuated by smart materials, the goal of the Phase 2 effort was to develop larger scale, smart hingeless control surfaces capable of high-rate actuation and quantify their performance benefits at test conditions representative of operational flight environments. To achieve this goal, a 30-percent geometric scale, full-span wind tunnel model of a proposed Northrop Grumman Corporation (NGC) Uninhabited Combat Air Vehicle (UCAV) was designed and tested. The model incorporated conventional, hinged control surfaces on the left side and smart, hingeless control surfaces on the right to allow incremental aerodynamic performance comparisons; including lift increment due to unit control surface deflection (CL), and roll moment due to unit control surface deflection (Cld). This paper describes the design, fabrication, system integration, and ground test results of the Smart Wing Phase 2 model. Topics that are covered include: (1) wind tunnel model selection; (2) analysis and design procedure; (3) smart control surface integration; (4) model instrumentation; and (5) static load and Ground Vibration Test (GVT) results and correlation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aerospace and Aviation Technology · Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Defense Analyses, 4850 Mark Center Dr., Alexandria, VA 22311, USA
Northrop Grumman Corporation, 1 Hornet Way, MS 9L11/W2, El Segundo, CA 90245, USA
NextGen Aeronautics, 2780 Skypark Drive, Suite 400, Torrance, CA 90505, USA
References (11)
Show source-provided references
1. Anon (May 1992). Wind Tunnel Design Criteria, Report Number LHB 1710.15, NASA Langley Research Center, Langley, VA .
2. Bartley-Cho, J.D., Wang, D.P. and West, M.N. (March 2002). “ Development, Control, and Test Results of High-Rate, Hingeless Trailing Edge Control Surface for the Smart Wing Phase 2 Wind Tunnel Model ,” SPIE Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, San Diego, CA, Paper No SS-4698–06.10.1117/12.475100 ↗
3. Bell, J.H. and Burner, A.W. (15–18 June 1998). “ Data Fusion in Wind Tunnel Testing; Combined Pressure Paint and Model Deformation Measurements ,” Presented at the 20th AIAA Advanced Measurement and Ground Testing Technology Conference, p. 20 Albuquerque, NM, AIAA 98–2500.10.2514/6.1998-2500 ↗
4. Burner, A.W. (May 1998). “ Model Deformation Measurements at NASA Langley Research Center ,” AGARD CP 601, Presented at the 81st Fluid Dynamics Panel Symposium on Advanced Aerodynamics Measurement Technology, pp. 34-1–34-9 , 22-25 September 1997, Seattle, WA.
5. Fleming, G.A. and Burner, A.W. (18–23 July 1999).“ Deformation Measurements of Smart Aerodynamic Surfaces ,” Abstract submitted for the SPIE International Symposium on Optical Science, Engineering and Instrumentation, Denver, CO.
6. Kudva, J.N., Martin, C.A., Scherer, L.B., Jardine, A.P., McGowan, A.R., Lake, R.C., Sendeckyj, G. and Sanders, B. (July 1999). “ Overview of the DARPA/AFRL/NASA Smart Wing Program ,” SPIE Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Newport Beach, CA, Vol. 3674, pp. 230–236 .10.1117/12.351561 ↗
7. Kudva, J.N., Sanders, B., Pinkerton-Florance, J. and Garcia, E. (March 2002). “ Overview of the DARPA/AFRL/NASA Smart Materials and Structures Smart Wing Program ,” SPIE Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, San Diego, CA, Paper No SS-4698-04.10.1117/12.475083 ↗
8. Martin, C.A., Kudva, J.N., Austin, F., Jardine, A.P., Scherer, L.B., Lockyer, A.J. and Carpenter, B.F. (1999). “Smart Materials and Structures Smart Wing Phase 1 Final Report,” AFRL-ML-WPTR-1999-4162, Air Vehicles Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH .
9. Sanders, B., Martin, C.A. and Cowan, D.L. (5–9 March 2001).“ Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Characteristics of the DARPA Smart Wing Phase II Wind Tunnel Model ,” SPIE Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, pp. 4332–4349 , Newport Beach, CA.10.1117/12.429679 ↗
10. Sanders, B. and Scherer, L.B. (2002). “ DARPA/AFRL Smart Wing Wind Tunnel Test Results ,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures.
11. Scherer, L.B., Martin, C.A., Sanders, B., West, M.N., Florance, J., Wieseman, C., Burner, A. and Fleming, G. (March 2002). “ DARPA/AFRL Smart Wing Phase 2 Wind Tunnel Test Results ,” SPIE Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, San Diego, CA, Paper No SS-4698-07.10.1117/12.475104 ↗