journal article·2017-11Open access

Metamodel-assisted design optimization of piezoelectric flex transducer for maximal bio-kinetic energy conversion

Liheng Luo, Dianzi Liu, Meiling Zhu, Jianqiao Ye

Abstract

Energy-harvesting devices have been widely used to generate electrical power from the bio-kinetic energy of human body movement. A novel piezoelectric flex transducer based on the Cymbal device has been proposed by other researchers for the purpose of energy harvesting. To further improve the efficiency of the device, optimal design of the piezoelectric flex transducer for maximum output power subject to stress and displacement constraints is carried out in this article. Sequential quadratic programming on metamodels generated with genetic programming from a 140-point optimal Latin hypercube design of experiments is used in the optimization. Finally, the optimal design is validated by finite element simulations. The simulations show that the magnitude of the electrical power generated from this optimal piezoelectric flex transducer harvesting device can be up to 6.5 MW when a safety design factor of 2.0 is applied.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

Faculty of Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UKUK

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. ANSYS · 2010
2. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/3/R0110.1088/0964-1726/16/3/R01 ↗
3. Armani U · 2014
4. 10.4203/ccp.97.4310.4203/ccp.97.43 ↗
5. Audze P · Problems of Dynamics and Strengths · 1977 · 35 · 104
6. Box JF · The American Statistician · 1980 · 34 · 1
7. Daniels A · 2014
8. 10.1088/1742-6596/476/1/01204710.1088/1742-6596/476/1/012047 ↗
9. 10.1177/1045389X1456888010.1177/1045389X14568880 ↗
10. 10.1002/978047077080110.1002/9780470770801 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.renene.2010.06.01410.1016/j.renene.2010.06.014 ↗
12. 10.4236/msa.2015.6908410.4236/msa.2015.69084 ↗
13. 10.1109/TUFFC.2007.46910.1109/TUFFC.2007.469 ↗
14. 10.1007/s12541-011-0151-310.1007/s12541-011-0151-3 ↗
15. 10.1002/nme.499610.1002/nme.4996 ↗
16. 10.1088/0964-1726/14/2/01310.1088/0964-1726/14/2/013 ↗
17. Koza JR · 1992
18. 10.1063/1.490084510.1063/1.4900845 ↗
19. 10.1109/TVLSI.2010.206957410.1109/TVLSI.2010.2069574 ↗
20. Newnham RE · 2000 · 1 · 29
21. Olodort R, Cazalet P (2004) Portable communication devices. Google Patents US20050125570 A1. Available at: www.google.com/patents/US20050125570 (accessed 3 June 2016).
22. Poli R, Langdon WB, McPhee NF (2008) A field guide to genetic programming. With contributions by J.R. Koza. Available at: www.gp-field-guide.org.uk (accessed 21 June 2016).
23. Powell MJD · 1977 · 144
24. 10.1109/58.5531410.1109/58.55314 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.04610.1016/j.rser.2015.10.046 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11664-011-1834-310.1007/s11664-011-1834-3 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.09.07110.1016/j.enconman.2015.09.071 ↗
28. 10.1088/0964-1726/8/3/30710.1088/0964-1726/8/3/307 ↗
29. Sohn H, Farrar CR, Hemez F, et al. (2002) A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Los Alamos National Laboratory report, LA-13976-MS. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=43453048A5725D068F53552AE67579DB?doi=10.1.1.729.3993&rep=rep1&type=pdf
30. 10.4203/ccp.87.710.4203/ccp.87.7 ↗
31. Wilson RB · 1963
32. 10.1177/1045389X1557138410.1177/1045389X15571384 ↗
33. 10.1177/1045389X1664586210.1177/1045389X16645862 ↗