journal article·2011-11

Influence of aspect ratio on effective electromechanical coupling of nanocomposites with lead zirconate titanate nanowire inclusion

Clark Andrews, Yirong Lin, Haixiong Tang, Henry A. Sodano

Publisher page

Abstract

Piezoelectric ceramics offer exceptional sensing and actuation properties, however, they are prone to breakage and are difficult to apply to curved surfaces in their monolithic form. One method to alleviate these issues is through the use of 0–3 active composites, which are formed by embedding piezoelectric particles into a polymer matrix that protects the ceramic from breaking under mechanical loading. This class of material offers certain advantages over monolithic materials; however, they have seen little use due to the low electromechanical coupling offered by these materials. Here, we demonstrate that by controlling the aspect ratio of the filler, the electromechanical coupling coefficient can be significantly improved. For all volume fractions tested, nanocomposites with high aspect ratio lead nanowires filler had higher coupling with increases as large as 2.3 times. Furthermore, the nanocomposite’s coupling was more than 50% of the piezoceramic fillers’ when nanowires were used.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dielectric materials and actuators · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University, 501 E Tyler Mall, ECG 303, Tempe AZ 85287, USA.

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, P.O. BOx 116250 Gainesville, FL 32611-6250.

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, P.O. BOx 116250 Gainesville, FL 32611-6250.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0022-0248(01)00857-010.1016/S0022-0248(01)00857-0 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.293927110.1063/1.2939271 ↗
3. 10.1023/A:100468920570610.1023/A:1004689205706 ↗
4. 10.1243/095440605X844110.1243/095440605X8441 ↗
5. Jaffe B · 1971
6. 10.1021/cg060760710.1021/cg0607607 ↗
7. 10.1021/jp060011010.1021/jp0600110 ↗
8. 10.1002/1521-4095(200108)13:16<1269::AID-ADMA1269>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/1521-4095(200108)13:16<1269::AID-ADMA1269>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
9. 10.1063/1.323717010.1063/1.3237170 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.159201310.1063/1.1592013 ↗
11. Pauer LA · IEEE Intercon Technical Papers · 1973 · 21 · 1
12. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01783.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01783.x ↗
13. 10.1016/S0142-9418(03)00003-510.1016/S0142-9418(03)00003-5 ↗
14. 10.1088/0022-3727/35/16/32110.1088/0022-3727/35/16/321 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0888-3270(03)00081-510.1016/S0888-3270(03)00081-5 ↗
16. Tang DY · 2006
17. 10.1016/0003-682X(94)90092-210.1016/0003-682X(94)90092-2 ↗
18. 10.1021/ja017694b10.1021/ja017694b ↗
19. 10.1088/0022-3727/34/4/30810.1088/0022-3727/34/4/308 ↗
20. 10.1109/TUFFC.2009.125410.1109/TUFFC.2009.1254 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20040099810.1002/adma.200400998 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.33121110.1063/1.331211 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.11.08810.1016/j.matlet.2006.11.088 ↗
24. 10.1039/b819910h10.1039/b819910h ↗
25. 10.1088/0256-307X/25/12/06310.1088/0256-307X/25/12/063 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.181442710.1063/1.1814427 ↗