Effects of atomic oxygen on epoxy-based shape memory polymer in low earth orbit
Source abstract
Abstract
Atomic oxygen is a dominant component of the low earth orbit and can erode most spacecraft polymeric material. In this article, the atomic oxygen erosion resistance tests of an epoxy-based shape memory polymer are carried out in a ground-based atomic oxygen simulator with a vacuum space chamber. The samples, before and after the atomic oxygen exposure, are compared in appearance, surface morphology, mass, main component, dynamical and static mechanical properties, and shape memory properties. The atomic oxygen exposure causes oxidization reaction of the material, which leads to surface roughen and mass loss, while the shape memory polymer main components remain same. The results of dynamical and static mechanical tests indicate that the atomic oxygen exposure has little effect on the storage modulus and glassy transition temperature (Tg), whereas the elongation, elastic modulus, tensile strength, and yield strength decrease since the atomic oxygen exposure gives rise to tiny cracks. The shape memory property has rarely changed since the atomic oxygen erosion is mainly located near the surface of the sample.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry · Polymer composites and self-healing · Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Composite Materials and Structures, Science Park of Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT), Harbin, People’s Republic of China
Department of Astronautical Science and Mechanics, Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT), Harbin, People’s Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Banks BA, Miller SK, De Groh KK (2004) Low earth orbital atomic oxygen interactions with materials. AIAA-2004-5638. Available at: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20040087142.pdf10.2514/6.2004-5638 ↗
2. Bungay CL, Tiwald TE, Devries MJ, et al. (2001) Spectroscopic Ellipsometry Characterization of Polymers Modified by Atomic Oxygen and Ultraviolet Radiation. Protection of Space Materials from the Space Environment. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 51–72.10.1007/978-94-010-0714-6_4 ↗
3. Dever J, Miller S, Messer R, et al. (2002) Exposure of polymer film thermal control materials on the materials international space station experiment (MISSE). AIAA-2001-4924. Available at: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20020038542.pdf
4. Fang H · 2006
5. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00368-310.1016/S1359-6454(02)00368-3 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.11.03110.1016/j.actaastro.2015.11.031 ↗
7. Ishizawa J · 2005
8. Ishizawa J · 2001 · 295
9. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/2/02400210.1088/0964-1726/18/2/024002 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.279049710.1063/1.2790497 ↗
11. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/9/09503110.1088/0964-1726/18/9/095031 ↗
12. 10.2514/6.2006-189610.2514/6.2006-1896 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.02910.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.029 ↗
14. 10.1021/am201509n10.1021/am201509n ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.001 ↗
16. Silverman EM (1995) Space environmental effects on spacecraft: LEO materials selection guide. NASA CR-4661. Available at: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19960000861.pdf
17. Srinivasan V · 1990
18. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.03.01310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.03.013 ↗
19. 10.1023/A:100469232924710.1023/A:1004692329247 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10853-012-6363-910.1007/s10853-012-6363-9 ↗
21. 10.1080/00222348.2015.102025710.1080/00222348.2015.1020257 ↗