Switchable stiffness morphing aerostructures based on granular jamming
Source abstract
Abstract
One of the persistent challenges facing the development of morphing aerostructures is the need to have material and structural solutions which provide a compromise between the competing design drivers of low actuation energy and high stiffness under external loads. This work proposes a solution to this challenge in the form of a novel switchable stiffness structural concept based on the principle of granular jamming. In this article, the concept of using granular jamming for controlling stiffness is first introduced. Four-point bending tests are used to obtain the flexural rigidity and bending stiffness of three different granular materials under different levels of applied vacuum loading. Nonlinear finite element analysis simulations using experimentally derived nonlinear material properties show good agreement with experiment. A specific application of this concept is then proposed based on the Fish Bone Active Camber morphing airfoil. A unit cell of this concept is built, tested and analysed, followed by the first prototype of a complete switchable stiffness Fish Bone Active Camber morphing airfoil, which is experimentally shown to be able to achieve an increase in stiffness of up to 300% due to granular jamming.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Bristol Composites Institute (ACCIS), Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1017/CBO978113954100810.1017/CBO9781139541008 ↗
2. ASTM C880 / C880M-18 (2018) Standard test method for flexural strength of dimension stone. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1520/C0880_C0880M-1810.1520/C0880_C0880M-18 ↗
3. 10.1039/C3SM52047A10.1039/C3SM52047A ↗
4. 10.1177/1045389X1141408410.1177/1045389X11414084 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.crhy.2015.02.00110.1016/j.crhy.2015.02.001 ↗
6. 10.1038/nature1066710.1038/nature10667 ↗
7. Butt JR (2005) A study of morphing wing effectiveness in fighter aircraft using exergy analysis and global optimization techniques. PhD Thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
8. Cheng NG (2013) Design and analysis of jammable granular systems. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81695
9. 10.1109/ICRA.2012.622537310.1109/ICRA.2012.6225373 ↗
10. Friswell M · 2009
11. Gilbert J · 1970
12. 10.1017/CBO978051157448110.1017/CBO9780511574481 ↗
13. Hemmelgarn CD, Pelley BM (2015) Passive adaptive structures. US9033283B1 Patent.
14. Hradil A · 2001
15. Hudson SW (2012) Mechanical characterization of jammable granular systems. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
16. Huijben F · 2014
17. Huijben F · 2009
18. 10.1039/C7SM00546F10.1039/C7SM00546F ↗
19. Iwashita K · 1999
20. 10.1039/C4SM01923G10.1039/C4SM01923G ↗
21. 10.1109/IROS.2012.638569610.1109/IROS.2012.6385696 ↗
22. Knaack U · 2008
23. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.07.00110.1016/j.paerosci.2013.07.001 ↗
24. Langewiesche W · 1944
25. 10.1007/s10035-010-0193-810.1007/s10035-010-0193-8 ↗
26. 10.1017/S000192400000113510.1017/S0001924000001135 ↗
27. 10.1088/0031-8949/87/05/05540410.1088/0031-8949/87/05/055404 ↗
28. Naaman AE · 1982
29. 10.2514/6.2006-213410.2514/6.2006-2134 ↗
30. 10.1177/1045389X1662956910.1177/1045389X16629569 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0926-5805(01)00081-410.1016/S0926-5805(01)00081-4 ↗
32. 10.2514/6.2014-112210.2514/6.2014-1122 ↗
33. 10.1177/1045389X1560423110.1177/1045389X15604231 ↗
34. 10.1177/1045389X1452170010.1177/1045389X14521700 ↗
35. 10.1115/SMASIS2012-805810.1115/SMASIS2012-8058 ↗
36. Zalewski M · Inżynieria materiałowa · 2007 · 28 · 350
37. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.11.00210.1016/j.mechmat.2012.11.002 ↗