Vibration suppression of a rotating cantilever beam under magnetic excitations by applying the magnetostrictive material
Source abstract
Abstract
The dynamic model and vibration suppression of a rotating cantilever beam under magnetic excitations are investigated in this article. The nonlinear constitutive relation of magnetostrictive materials is presented. The layout of the control system is demonstrated and explained. The kinetic energy, potential energy of the system, and work done by the electromagnetic force are obtained. The dynamic equations of the system are obtained and discretized by the Hamilton principle and Galerkin approach, respectively. Based on the negative feedback control method, the control scheme is implemented by the magnetostrictive layer. The dynamic model and control method are validated by the references. Various parameter values of the magnetic excitations and rotating beam systems are investigated to reveal their effects on the control behaviors of the bending vibration. Results illustrate that the magnetic excitations bring negative stiffness in the system and increase the responses of beam greatly. The magnetostrictive suppression is effective and can be regarded as the damping effect in the dynamic equations. Increasing the control gain, bias magnetic field and width ratio of the magnetostrictive layer to the controlled layer are beneficial to the vibration control. However, enlarging the angular velocity and pre-stress is harmful to the vibration suppression.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.10.02910.1016/j.jsv.2015.10.029 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.12.04910.1016/j.jsv.2003.12.049 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2011.03.01710.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2011.03.017 ↗
4. 10.1177/1045389X1663421210.1177/1045389X16634212 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jsv.2014.08.01910.1016/j.jsv.2014.08.019 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.06.00110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.06.001 ↗
7. 10.1006/jsvi.2001.385610.1006/jsvi.2001.3856 ↗
8. 10.1177/1045389X0605950010.1177/1045389X06059500 ↗
9. Hamza-Cherif SM · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering · 2005 · 2 · 255
10. 10.1177/014233121039403310.1177/0142331210394033 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.06.00110.1016/j.compstruc.2010.06.001 ↗
12. 10.2514/3.2019510.2514/3.20195 ↗
13. 10.1177/107754631140630710.1177/1077546311406307 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.06.00410.1016/j.jsv.2013.06.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00016-610.1016/S0045-7949(03)00016-6 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.11.00110.1016/j.jsv.2013.11.001 ↗
17. 10.1177/1045389X1036163110.1177/1045389X10361631 ↗
18. 10.1007/s13369-014-1566-910.1007/s13369-014-1566-9 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.12.02310.1016/j.jsv.2006.12.023 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.05.03410.1016/j.jsv.2009.05.034 ↗
21. 10.1088/0964-1726/11/6/30810.1088/0964-1726/11/6/308 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.08510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.085 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ast.2014.04.00810.1016/j.ast.2014.04.008 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jsv.2004.06.03410.1016/j.jsv.2004.06.034 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.05.01410.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.05.014 ↗
26. 10.1109/TASC.2004.83092910.1109/TASC.2004.830929 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00611-410.1016/S0022-460X(03)00611-4 ↗
28. 10.1006/jsvi.1995.013910.1006/jsvi.1995.0139 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.185061810.1063/1.1850618 ↗
30. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/1/02410.1088/0964-1726/16/1/024 ↗
31. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/3/01510.1088/0964-1726/15/3/015 ↗