journal article·2019-11

Use of delay and sum for sparse reconstruction improvement for structural health monitoring

Ali Nokhbatolfoghahai, Hossein M Navazi, Roger M Groves

Publisher page

Abstract

To perform active structural health monitoring, guided Lamb waves for damage detection have recently gained extensive attention. Many algorithms are used for damage detection with guided waves and among them, the delay-and-sum method is the most commonly used algorithm because of its robustness and simplicity. However, delay-and-sum images tend to have poor accuracy with a large spot size and a high noise floor, especially in the presence of multiple damages. To overcome these problems, another method that is based on sparse reconstruction can be used. Although the images produced by the sparse reconstruction method are superior to the conventional delay-and-sum method, it has the challenges of the time and cost of computations in comparison with the delay-and-sum method. Also, in some cases in multi-damage detection, the sparse reconstruction method totally fails. In this article, using prior support information of the structure achieved by the delay-and-sum method, a hybrid method based on sparse reconstruction method is proposed to improve the computational performance and robustness of sparse reconstruction method in the case of multi-damage presence. The effectiveness of the proposed method in detecting damages is demonstrated experimentally and numerically on a simple aluminum plate. The technique is also shown to accurately identify and localize multi-site damages as well as single damage with low sampled signals.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Aerospace Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Aerospace Non-Destructive Testing Laboratory, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/58.14317210.1109/58.143172 ↗
2. 10.1002/978047061207110.1002/9780470612071 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.01.05210.1016/j.jsv.2009.01.052 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.09.03510.1016/j.neucom.2014.09.035 ↗
5. 10.1109/TIT.2016.256912210.1109/TIT.2016.2569122 ↗
6. 10.1098/rspa.2011.009510.1098/rspa.2011.0095 ↗
7. 10.1109/TIT.2011.216721410.1109/TIT.2011.2167214 ↗
8. 10.1177/1045389X0505010610.1177/1045389X05050106 ↗
9. Giurgiutiu V · 2014
10. 10.1177/147592170404269710.1177/1475921704042697 ↗
11. Giurgiutiu V, Yu L, Bottai GS, et al. (2011) Structural health monitoring apparatus and methodology. US7881881B2 Patent.
12. Glisic B · 2008
13. 10.1117/1.JEI.25.4.04301310.1117/1.JEI.25.4.043013 ↗
14. 10.1121/1.40749510.1121/1.407495 ↗
15. 10.1109/TUFFC.2010.169210.1109/TUFFC.2010.1692 ↗
16. 10.1109/ISIT.2009.520571610.1109/ISIT.2009.5205716 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.02.01710.1016/j.jsv.2019.02.017 ↗
18. 10.1098/rspa.1917.000810.1098/rspa.1917.0008 ↗
19. Levine RM (2014) Ultrasonic guided wave imaging via sparse reconstruction. PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
20. 10.1121/1.478898410.1121/1.4788984 ↗
21. 10.1109/TUFFC.2014.299610.1109/TUFFC.2014.2996 ↗
22. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/3/03503510.1088/0964-1726/17/3/035035 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.171178810.1063/1.1711788 ↗
24. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/5/05300110.1088/0964-1726/25/5/053001 ↗
25. Needell D · Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA · 2017 · 6 · 284
26. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/4/02210.1088/0964-1726/13/4/022 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.08.01710.1016/j.ultras.2012.08.017 ↗
28. 10.1115/1.149127210.1115/1.1491272 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.05810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.058 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.08.01910.1016/j.ymssp.2018.08.019 ↗
31. 10.1002/978111853614810.1002/9781118536148 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.02010.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.020 ↗
33. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/2/02010.1088/0964-1726/13/2/020 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ultras.2018.02.01110.1016/j.ultras.2018.02.011 ↗
35. 10.2172/435606910.2172/4356069 ↗
36. 10.1109/58.58519010.1109/58.585190 ↗
37. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/10/10500210.1088/0964-1726/20/10/105002 ↗
38. 10.1177/147592171668084910.1177/1475921716680849 ↗