Effects of carbon nanotube reinforcements on vibration suppression of magnetorheological fluid sandwich beam
Source abstract
Abstract
Vibration suppression of a carbon nanotube–reinforced sandwich beam with magnetorheological fluid core is numerically investigated by employing the differential quadrature method. The beam has functionally graded carbon nanotube–reinforced composite base and constraining layers while its core layer is made of magnetorheological fluid. Four different types of distribution of carbon nanotubes along the thickness direction are considered. The extended rule of mixture is used to explain the effective material properties of the base and constraining layers of the beam. The equations of motion and corresponding boundary conditions are derived by applying Hamilton’s principle, and then these coupled differential equations are transformed into a set of algebraic equation applying the differential quadrature method. Natural frequencies and loss factors are extracted and compared with those available in literature. Convergence study has been performed to verify stability of the method. Effects of various parameters such as magnetic field intensity, mode number, and thickness of the magnetorheological fluid core layer on the natural frequencies and loss factors are studied.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Qom University of Technology, Qom, Iran
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/1045389X1875435010.1177/1045389X18754350 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.02.01110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.02.011 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.01510.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.015 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.06.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2010.06.005 ↗
5. 10.1016/0021-9991(72)90089-710.1016/0021-9991(72)90089-7 ↗
6. 10.1177/1045389X1877836310.1177/1045389X18778363 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.00510.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.005 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.amc.2016.05.03410.1016/j.amc.2016.05.034 ↗
9. 10.1080/15376494.2016.119678610.1080/15376494.2016.1196786 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2006.06.01110.1016/j.commatsci.2006.06.011 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jsv.2004.03.04510.1016/j.jsv.2004.03.045 ↗
12. 10.1080/0149573059093403810.1080/01495730590934038 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.06710.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.067 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00707-016-1593-610.1007/s00707-016-1593-6 ↗
15. 10.1080/15376494.2016.125581910.1080/15376494.2016.1255819 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.10.04110.1016/j.jsv.2010.10.041 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.09.01010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.09.010 ↗
18. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/1/01501310.1088/0964-1726/19/1/015013 ↗
19. 10.1007/978-1-4471-0407-010.1007/978-1-4471-0407-0 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11709-018-0466-610.1007/s11709-018-0466-6 ↗
21. 10.1177/168781401769318210.1177/1687814017693182 ↗
22. 10.1142/S021945541540011810.1142/S0219455415400118 ↗
23. 10.1080/1539773060077340310.1080/15397730600773403 ↗