journal article·2019-06

Bending theory for laminated composite cantilever beams with multiple embedded shape memory alloy layers

Nguyen Van Viet, Wael Zaki, Rehan Umer

Publisher page

Abstract

In this article, a new analytical model is proposed for laminated composite cantilever beams consisting of multiple alternating superelastic shape memory alloy and elastic layers. The model is based on the Zaki–Moumni model for shape memory alloys combined with Timoshenko’s beam theory. The Zaki–Moumni model accounts for solid phase transformation as well as detwinning and reorientation of martensite under multiaxial thermomechanical loading conditions. Mathematical formulas are first derived to characterize the evolution of the solid phase structure within the beam with a prescribed load at the tip during loading and unloading. Analytical moment–curvature and shear force–shear strain relations are then obtained following the strength of materials approach. The present work is the first to fully develop the nonlinear expressions of the axial stress in terms of the distance from the neutral plane and to allow the description of the phase distribution in both the longitudinal and the transverse directions in the beam as the load evolves. The proposed model is validated against finite element analysis and high-accuracy numerical solutions. The influence of temperature and the number of shape memory alloy layers on the superelastic behavior of the laminate is also investigated.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Topology Optimization in Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE

Centre for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

Funding

khalifa university of science, technology and research

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/1/01300110.1088/0964-1726/20/1/013001 ↗
2. Asadi H, Akbarzadeh AH, Wang Q (2016a) Nonlinear thermo-inertial instability of functionally graded shape memory alloy sandwich plates. Composite Structure 20(1): 496–508.
3. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/7/07501210.1088/0964-1726/23/7/075012 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0020-7403(97)00008-810.1016/S0020-7403(97)00008-8 ↗
5. 10.1016/1359-8368(96)00010-810.1016/1359-8368(96)00010-8 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.01810.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.018 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0749-6419(96)00030-710.1016/S0749-6419(96)00030-7 ↗
8. 10.1177/1045389X930040021310.1177/1045389X9300400213 ↗
9. Butera F, Coda A, Vergani G (2007) Shape memory actuators for automotive applications. In: Nanotec IT (Newsletter). Roma: AIRI/Nanotec IT, pp. 12–16.
10. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2011.04.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2011.04.003 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1359-8368(99)00006-210.1016/S1359-8368(99)00006-2 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/10/10300110.1088/0964-1726/25/10/103001 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2017.01.00810.1016/j.mechmat.2017.01.008 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.10.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.10.008 ↗
15. 10.1109/ROBOT.1989.10020010.1109/ROBOT.1989.100200 ↗
16. 10.1016/B978-012269440-0/50006-610.1016/B978-012269440-0/50006-6 ↗
17. 10.1177/1045389X960070031310.1177/1045389X9600700313 ↗
18. 10.2320/matertrans1989.34.22410.2320/matertrans1989.34.224 ↗
19. Glass-Epoxy (2018) G-10 / FR-4 / G-11. Available at: www.dielectriccorp.com/downloads/thermosets/glass-epoxy.pdf (accessed 26 March 2018).
20. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.11.00510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.11.005 ↗
21. 10.1177/1045389X1559529510.1177/1045389X15595295 ↗
22. 10.1007/s11661-998-1022-010.1007/s11661-998-1022-0 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.08.01810.1016/j.ijplas.2014.08.018 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.08410.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.084 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.05910.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.059 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.01810.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.018 ↗
27. 10.1177/1045389X900010020510.1177/1045389X9000100205 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.024 ↗
29. 10.1590/S0100-879X200300060000110.1590/S0100-879X2003000600001 ↗
30. 10.2514/2.191810.2514/2.1918 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.09.01610.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.09.016 ↗
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000024910.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000249 ↗
33. 10.1177/1045389X1244844610.1177/1045389X12448446 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00090-210.1016/S0263-8223(99)00090-2 ↗
35. Otsuka K, Wayman CM (1998) Shape Memory Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Park J, Headings ML, Dapino MJ, et al. (2015) Investigation of interfacial shear stresses, shape fixity, and actuation strain in composites incorporating shape memory polymers and shape memory alloys. Frontier in Materials 2: 12.
37. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.10.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2009.10.009 ↗
38. 10.1177/146441931772863510.1177/1464419317728635 ↗
39. 10.1177/1045389X1775426810.1177/1045389X17754268 ↗
40. Rogers CA, Liang C, Baker DK (1989) Dynamic Control Concepts Using Shape Memory Alloy Reinforced Plates (Smart Materials, Structures, and Mathematical Issues). Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
41. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.01.01710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.01.017 ↗
42. 10.1007/s10999-018-9413-x.10.1007/s10999-018-9413-x. ↗
43. 10.1080/1537649050025925110.1080/15376490500259251 ↗
44. 10.1016/0022-5096(95)00024-D10.1016/0022-5096(95)00024-D ↗
45. 10.1177/1045389X1662957210.1177/1045389X16629572 ↗
46. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/10/10500310.1088/0964-1726/22/10/105003 ↗
47. Timoshenko SP (1921) On the correction factor for shear of the differential equation for transverse vibrations of bars of uniform cross-section. Philosophical Magazine 744: 125–131.
48. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.06.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2011.06.007 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.00910.1016/j.msea.2012.01.009 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.01.02310.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.01.023 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.08.00710.1016/j.commatsci.2015.08.007 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.06010.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.060 ↗
53. 10.1515/jmmm-2016-0153.10.1515/jmmm-2016-0153. ↗
54. Viet NV Zaki W Umer R (2018a) Analytical model for a laminated shape memory alloy beam with piezoelectric layers. In: Proceedings of SPIE 10596 behavior and mechanics of multifunctional materials and composites XII Denver CO 4–8 March paper no. 105960A. Bellingham WA: SPIE.10.1117/12.2296373 ↗
55. 10.1177/1045389X1879949710.1177/1045389X18799497 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.04110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.041 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.03510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.035 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.12.01110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.12.011 ↗
59. 10.1117/12.229638310.1117/12.2296383 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.00110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.001 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.06210.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.062 ↗
62. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa6c1710.1088/1361-665X/aa6c17 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2017.05.00310.1016/j.ijengsci.2017.05.003 ↗
64. 10.1515/ehs-2015-002210.1515/ehs-2015-0022 ↗
65. 10.1007/s11709-013-0221-y10.1007/s11709-013-0221-y ↗
66. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/2/02500910.1088/0964-1726/19/2/025009 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.04.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2012.04.002 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.05.03810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.05.038 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.jmps.2007.03.01210.1016/j.jmps.2007.03.012 ↗
70. 10.1080/15376494.2011.60501610.1080/15376494.2011.605016 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.005 ↗
72. 10.1080/15376494.2018.1444228.10.1080/15376494.2018.1444228. ↗
73. 10.1177/109963621772973110.1177/1099636217729731 ↗