journal article·2015-10

Electromechanical response of micromachined 1-3 piezoelectric composites: Effect of etched piezo-pillar slope

Xiaohua Jian, Sibo Li, Wenbin Huang, Yaoyao Cui, Xiaoning Jiang

Publisher page

Abstract

Micromachined single-crystal piezoelectric 1-3 composites are known for high electromechanical coupling coefficients, low acoustic impedance, high processing precision and uniformity, which are desired for high-frequency ultrasound transducers. In this article, based on Smith and Auld’s 1-3 composite thickness-mode oscillation model, the effect of etched side wall slope on the electromechanical characteristics of micromachined piezoelectric 1-3 composites was studied. In specific, strain constant, stiffness, dielectric constant, electromechanical coupling coefficient, acoustic impedance, longitudinal velocity, and frequency of micromachined 1-3 composites were deduced using the developed model. The analytical model was then verified by a COMSOL simulation and experimental measurements of a micromachined composite sample with pitch of 15.9 µm, thickness of 42.8 µm, and etched pillar slope angle of 83.8°. The measured center frequency was 49.05 MHz, electromechanical coupling coefficient was 0.66, dielectric constant was 1178, and strain constant was 26.90 C/m 2 , which all agreed well with the analytical calculations. These results will be helpful in design and fabrication of high-frequency micromachined ultrasound transducers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/OCEANS.2001.96866210.1109/OCEANS.2001.968662 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.477248210.1063/1.4772482 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00436-510.1016/S0041-624X(02)00436-5 ↗
4. Jiang X · 2006 · 918
5. 10.1109/ULTSYM.2008.004010.1109/ULTSYM.2008.0040 ↗
6. 10.1109/58.65518810.1109/58.655188 ↗
7. 10.1007/978-0-387-76540-210.1007/978-0-387-76540-2 ↗
8. 10.5923/j.eee.20120206.0410.5923/j.eee.20120206.04 ↗
9. Smith WA · 1990 · 145
10. 10.1109/58.6783310.1109/58.67833 ↗
11. 10.1117/12.14850710.1117/12.148507 ↗
12. Standards Committee of the IEEE Ultrasonics (1988) IEEE Standard on Piezoelectricity. ANSI/IEEE Std 176–1987: 0–1. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=2511
13. 10.1080/00150193.2010.48554610.1080/00150193.2010.485546 ↗
14. 10.1109/58.89591110.1109/58.895911 ↗
15. 10.1109/ULTSYM.2006.24610.1109/ULTSYM.2006.246 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.149956710.1063/1.1499567 ↗