journal article·2017-06Open access

Modeling approach to evaluating reduction in stress intensity factor in center-cracked plate with piezoelectric actuator patches

Ahmed Abuzaid, Meftah Hrairi, MSI Shaik Dawood

Abstract

Active repairs using piezoelectric actuators can play a significant role in reducing the crack damage propagation in thin plate structures. Mode-I crack opening displacement is the most predominant one in tension, and it is responsible for the failure which in turn affects the load carrying capability of the cracked structure. In addition, there are limited studies that investigated the effect of the piezoelectric actuator over mode-I active repair. In this study, the mode-I stress intensity factor for a plate with a center crack, and a bonded piezoelectric actuator was modeled using the linear elastic fracture mechanics. For this, an analytical closed-form solution is developed using the virtual crack closure technique taking into account mode-I as the only effective mode, coupling effects of the piezoelectric patch, and the singular stress at the crack tip. In addition, the total stress intensity factor was obtained by the superposition of the stress intensity factor obtained from the stresses produced by the piezoelectric actuators on the crack surfaces as the only external loads on the cracked plate and the stress intensity factor due to the far-field tension load. The proposed analytical model for mode-I stress intensity factor was verified by a finite element–based approach using ANSYS finite element software. The results demonstrated a good agreement between the analytical and finite element models with a relative error of less than 4% in all the cases studied. The results illustrated that the piezoelectric patch is efficient in reducing stress intensity factor when an extension mode of the actuator is applied. However, applying a contraction mode of the piezoelectric actuators produced negative strain which increased the stress intensity factor and thus the severity of the cracked structure and could lead to damage propagation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Numerical methods in engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.799-800.78810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.799-800.788 ↗
2. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1115.51710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1115.517 ↗
3. 10.3390/act402007710.3390/act4020077 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.10.00810.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.10.008 ↗
5. 10.1177/1045389X1142528110.1177/1045389X11425281 ↗
6. 10.2514/3.2002910.2514/3.20029 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0015526610.1007/BF00155266 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00151-010.1016/S0045-7949(99)00151-0 ↗
9. 10.1117/12.23901810.1117/12.239018 ↗
10. 10.2514/2.156110.2514/2.1561 ↗
11. 10.2514/3.979210.2514/3.9792 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/01/01501710.1088/0964-1726/17/01/015017 ↗
13. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2008.01282.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2008.01282.x ↗
14. 10.1177/1045389X0303106210.1177/1045389X03031062 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00027-910.1016/S0013-7944(02)00027-9 ↗
16. 10.1002/nme.162009030210.1002/nme.1620090302 ↗
17. Irwin GR · SPIE Milestone Series MS · 1997 · 137 · 167
18. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.06.01410.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.06.014 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.03.00310.1016/j.paerosci.2013.03.003 ↗
20. 10.1121/1.39878810.1121/1.398788 ↗
21. 10.1023/A:102657440085810.1023/A:1026574400858 ↗
22. 10.1002/cnm.163008050310.1002/cnm.1630080503 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2006.11.00410.1016/j.tafmec.2006.11.004 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.11.00410.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.11.004 ↗
25. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/8/08500910.1088/0964-1726/20/8/085009 ↗
26. 10.1177/1045389X0201301100110.1177/1045389X02013011001 ↗
27. 10.1115/1.309891810.1115/1.3098918 ↗
28. 10.1117/12.35074310.1117/12.350743 ↗
29. 10.1088/0964-1726/3/3/00610.1088/0964-1726/3/3/006 ↗
30. 10.3923/jeasci.2011.222.22610.3923/jeasci.2011.222.226 ↗
31. 10.1007/BF0018455910.1007/BF00184559 ↗
32. Srinivasan AV · 2001
33. Tada H · 2000
34. 10.1007/978-1-4471-2333-010.1007/978-1-4471-2333-0 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00088-510.1016/S0013-7944(98)00088-5 ↗
36. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/5/02610.1088/0964-1726/13/5/026 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.09.01810.1016/j.compstruc.2004.09.018 ↗
38. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/1/01300110.1088/0964-1726/21/1/013001 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.09.01210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.09.012 ↗
40. 10.1088/0964-1726/11/3/31110.1088/0964-1726/11/3/311 ↗
41. 10.1260/13694330577435314210.1260/136943305774353142 ↗
42. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/10/10502510.1088/0964-1726/19/10/105025 ↗
43. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/11/11502310.1088/0964-1726/20/11/115023 ↗