Nonlinear acoustics for structural health monitoring using mobile, wireless and smartphone-based transducer platform
Source abstract
Abstract
This article demonstrates a mobile, wireless and smartphone-based platform that can be used for damage detection. This platform consists of sensors, electronics, Android-based software and a smartphone that is used for control, communication, data storage, damage detection analysis and the presentation of damage detection results. The method applied for crack detection is based on nonlinear acoustics. Nonlinear vibro-acoustic wave modulations are used to detect damage. The performance of the proposed damage detection system is demonstrated using a simple example of fatigue crack detection in aluminium plates. The results show that cracks in aluminium plates can be detected wirelessly by a smartphone. This proof-of-concept not only demonstrates the capability of the entire transducer platform but also shows that nonlinear acoustic methods can be applied wirelessly on systems that are operated by a smartphone. This is particularly important when monitored structures are difficult to access and/or operate in harsh conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow, Poland
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Arum Sundaram B · Current Science · 2013 · 104 · 1496
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.09.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2009.09.004 ↗
3. Balasubramaniam K · Structural Control & Health Monitoring · 2014 · 21 · 817
4. 10.1002/978047006162610.1002/9780470061626 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.09.03310.1016/j.jsv.2013.09.033 ↗
6. 10.1177/1045389X0935071910.1177/1045389X09350719 ↗
7. 10.5539/mas.v7n2p5710.5539/mas.v7n2p57 ↗
8. 10.1177/1045389X980090090910.1177/1045389X9800900909 ↗
9. 10.1121/1.216142910.1121/1.2161429 ↗
10. 10.1177/1045389X1350735210.1177/1045389X13507352 ↗
11. 10.1177/147592171141423610.1177/1475921711414236 ↗
12. Kohut P · Diagnostyka · 2013 · 14 · 47
13. 10.14778/2536274.253629610.14778/2536274.2536296 ↗
14. Lisowski M · 2014
15. Liu P · 2014
16. 10.1177/058310240606149910.1177/0583102406061499 ↗
17. Maia NMM · 1998
18. Martowicz A · Diagnostyka · 2011 · 3 · 3
19. 10.1007/s13349-012-0025-010.1007/s13349-012-0025-0 ↗
20. 10.1177/1045389X0707740010.1177/1045389X07077400 ↗
21. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/4/02510.1088/0964-1726/15/4/025 ↗
22. 10.1177/14759217020010010210.1177/147592170200100102 ↗
23. 10.1177/09544062022160090310.1177/095440620221600903 ↗
24. 10.1177/09544062022160090410.1177/095440620221600904 ↗
25. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/10/10502110.1088/0964-1726/23/10/105021 ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2008.01253.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2008.01253.x ↗
27. 10.1177/1045389X0301400100510.1177/1045389X03014001005 ↗
28. Vogt P · Frontiers in Sensors · 2014 · 2 · 1
29. 10.1177/1045389X1454677710.1177/1045389X14546777 ↗
30. 10.1109/ICICIP.2012.639152410.1109/ICICIP.2012.6391524 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2007.12.01210.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2007.12.012 ↗