Dynamic analysis and ℋ 2 optimisation of a piezo-based tuned vibration absorber
Source abstract
Abstract
In this article, a piezo-based tuned vibration absorber is proposed and theoretically analysed. The proposed device consists of a proof mass, a piezoelectric actuator and a resilient element (spring). An equivalent mechanical model where the piezoelectric element is connected to a general circuit composed of a resistor, an inductor and a capacitor in series ( RLC) is presented to illustrate the coupling of the electrical components with the mechanical systems. Based on the mechanical replacement model, a C or L circuit can be used to realise a piezo-based tuned vibration neutraliser, while with an RC or RL circuit the piezo-based tuned vibration absorber can be considered as a piezo-based tuned mass damper. For the C and L circuits, tuning strategies are derived to adjust the shunt capacitance and inductance to track the disturbance frequency. In the case of RC and RL shunt circuits, an ℋ 2 optimisation criterion is used for tuning the piezo-based tuned mass damper. Closed-form expressions for the optimal tuning parameters are provided in this article.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Production Engineering, Machine Design and Automation (PMA) Section, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium
Flanders’ Mechatronics Technology Centre (FMTC), Heverlee, Belgium
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.01.01210.1016/j.jsv.2012.01.012 ↗
2. 10.1088/0964-1726/12/1/30310.1088/0964-1726/12/1/303 ↗
3. 10.1088/0964-1726/14/5/04410.1088/0964-1726/14/5/044 ↗
4. 10.1177/10453890140043802810.1177/104538901400438028 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.37195410.1063/1.371954 ↗
6. 10.1006/jsvi.1999.275510.1006/jsvi.1999.2755 ↗
7. De Marneffe B (2007) Active and passive vibration isolation and damping via shunted transducers. PhD Thesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussel.
8. Den Hartog JP · 1934
9. 10.1121/1.482412310.1121/1.4824123 ↗
10. 10.1177/1045389X0708312210.1177/1045389X07083122 ↗
11. 10.1016/0022-460X(91)90762-910.1016/0022-460X(91)90762-9 ↗
12. 10.1177/1045389X940050010610.1177/1045389X9400500106 ↗
13. 10.1177/1045389X940050041210.1177/1045389X9400500412 ↗
14. Hunt JB · 1979
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:12(1342)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:12(1342) ↗
16. James HM · 1947
17. 10.1115/1.142363410.1115/1.1423634 ↗
18. 10.1177/05831024980300030110.1177/058310249803000301 ↗
19. Mead DJ · 1999
20. Meirovitch L · 1990
21. Moheimani SOR · 2006
22. 10.1299/jsmemovic.2010._2B14-1_10.1299/jsmemovic.2010._2B14-1_ ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.04.04310.1016/j.jsv.2006.04.043 ↗
24. Newland DE · 2012
25. Niederberger D (2005) Smart damping materials using shunt control. PhD Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich.
26. 10.1155/2003/86325210.1155/2003/863252 ↗
27. Preumont A · 2002
28. 10.1088/0964-1726/14/1/00210.1088/0964-1726/14/1/002 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ast.2013.05.00110.1016/j.ast.2013.05.001 ↗
30. 10.1115/1.283646210.1115/1.2836462 ↗
31. Von Flotow AH · 1994 · 437
32. 10.1016/0022-460X(92)90045-Y10.1016/0022-460X(92)90045-Y ↗
33. 10.1002/eqe.429010030410.1002/eqe.4290100304 ↗
34. 10.1006/jsvi.2000.349610.1006/jsvi.2000.3496 ↗
35. 10.1117/12.23909310.1117/12.239093 ↗
36. Zhao G · 2012 · 449
37. 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.04.02310.1016/j.jsv.2012.04.023 ↗