Self-sensing of Damage in Carbon Fiber Polymer–Matrix Composite Cylinder by Electrical Resistance Measurement
Source abstract
Abstract
Self-sensing of damage, as attained by electrical resistance measurement, was found to be effective in a carbon fiber polymer–matrix composite cylinder made by filament winding. Resistance was measured in the axial, radial, oblique, and circumferential directions by using circumferential or axial electrical contacts on the outer and/or inner surfaces of the cylinder. Minor damage upon drop impact at 10 J or below caused the radial resistance to decrease irreversibly, whereas major damage upon drop impact above 10 J caused the radial, oblique, and axial resistances to increase irreversibly. The circumferential resistance ratio (ratio of the circumferential resistance of a damaged area to that away from the damaged area) was most sensitive, increasing monotonically with impact energy >1.4 J.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Advanced Energy Technologies and Civil Engineering Innovations · Icing and De-icing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Composite Materials Research Laboratory, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260-4400, USA
Global Contour Ltd, 1145 Ridge Road West, Rockwall, TX 75087, USA
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00181-010.1016/S0266-3538(00)00181-0 ↗
2. Brooks, D. · 111
3. Ceysson, O., Salvia, M. and Vincent, L. 1995. “ In situ Study of the Evolution of Various Damage Factors in Long Carbon Fiber/Polymer Matrix Composites to Measure Electric Resistance and Acoustic Emission,” In: Annales des Composites, Micromecanique et Mechanismes del Endommagement des Composites, Vol. 4, Paris, pp. 173–182.
4. Chung, D.D.L. · Polym. & Polym. Compos. · 2003 · 11 · 515
5. Hayes, S. · 376
6. 10.1088/0964-1726/6/4/00710.1088/0964-1726/6/4/007 ↗
7. Kemp, R.M.J. · IMech E Seminar, Aircraft Structures and Materials · 1996 · 10 · 47
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/5/02110.1088/0964-1726/13/5/021 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00180-910.1016/S0266-3538(00)00180-9 ↗
10. Mitrovic, M. · 3078
11. 10.1016/S0151-9107(01)80008-810.1016/S0151-9107(01)80008-8 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/5/6/00910.1088/0964-1726/5/6/009 ↗
13. 10.1002/pc.1032210.1002/pc.10322 ↗
14. 10.1088/0964-1726/6/4/01710.1088/0964-1726/6/4/017 ↗
15. 10.1557/JMR.1998.042010.1557/JMR.1998.0420 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1359-8368(97)00014-010.1016/S1359-8368(97)00014-0 ↗
17. 10.1163/156855498X0014410.1163/156855498X00144 ↗
18. 10.1023/A:100467202422110.1023/A:1004672024221 ↗
19. 10.1557/JMR.1999.057210.1557/JMR.1999.0572 ↗
20. Wang, S. and Chung, D.D.L. 1999a. “Interlaminar Shear in Carbon Fiber Polymer-Matrix Composites, Studied by Measuring the Contact Electrical Resistance of the Interlaminar Interface During Shear,” Composite Interfaces, 6(6):507–518.10.1163/156855499X00189 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1359-8368(99)00020-710.1016/S1359-8368(99)00020-7 ↗
22. 10.1023/A:100462950599210.1023/A:1004629505992 ↗
23. Wang, S. · Polym. & Polym. Compos. · 2001 · 9 · 135
24. 10.1016/S0143-7496(01)00023-910.1016/S0143-7496(01)00023-9 ↗
25. 10.1163/15685540275364289010.1163/156855402753642890 ↗
26. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/3/01710.1088/0964-1726/13/3/017 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10853-005-6289-610.1007/s10853-005-6289-6 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.005 ↗
29. Yanagida, H. · Design · 2000 · 21 · 507
30. Zolfaghar, K. · 314