Nonlinear Analysis and Optimization of Diamond Cell Morphing Wings
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, a two-stage design optimization procedure is developed to explore the effect of optimal actuator placement and position on energy efficiency in morphing wings. Diamond-shaped cells similar to NextGen's Batwing concept are used to examine this procedure. The finite element model considers elastic skin, actuator, and aerodynamic loads. Force displacement and efficiency studies are conducted using one and two unit cells, respectively. The model is then expanded to include multiple unit cells and actuators. A two-stage optimization process using a Genetic Algorithm and gradient-based optimization is also developed. The two-stage optimization is used to optimize actuator position and placement for different constraints and load cases. Results show that placement and position optimization produce small gains in energy efficiency; morphing using a soft isotropic skin is more efficient than stiff isotropic or anisotropic skins. In addition, the GA did not use all of the available actuators to maximize energy efficiency. The total actuator mass is also considered and is dependent on the maximum applied force per actuator and the number of actuators in the mechanism.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Structural Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Penn State University, University Park, PA
Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Penn State University, University Park, PA,
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0964-1726/14/6/03510.1088/0964-1726/14/6/035 ↗
2. 10.1007/s00158005012410.1007/s001580050124 ↗
3. Bharti, S.
4. Bharti, S.
5. Bharti, S.
6. 10.2495/1-84564-095-0/5c10.2495/1-84564-095-0/5c ↗
7. Crisfield, M.A. · 1991
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/8/2/01210.1088/0964-1726/8/2/012 ↗
9. 10.1115/1.282944810.1115/1.2829448 ↗
10. Jha, A.K.
11. Johnson, T.
12. Joo, J.J. · Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, Smart Structures and Materials 2006 - Modeling, Signal Processing, and Control · 2006 · 6166
13. Li, Y.
14. 10.1073/pnas.02205289910.1073/pnas.022052899 ↗
15. Marks, P. · 2003
16. 2008
17. 10.1007/978-3-540-39930-810.1007/978-3-540-39930-8 ↗
18. 10.1088/0964-1726/8/1/00210.1088/0964-1726/8/1/002 ↗
19. Prock, B.C.
20. Ramrkahyani, D.S.
21. 10.1088/0964-1726/8/4/30610.1088/0964-1726/8/4/306 ↗
22. 10.2514/2.306210.2514/2.3062 ↗
23. 10.1109/58.84205410.1109/58.842054 ↗
24. Simpson, M.
25. 10.1088/0964-1726/11/4/30310.1088/0964-1726/11/4/303 ↗
26. 10.1088/0964-1726/9/4/31910.1088/0964-1726/9/4/319 ↗