journal article·2012-03

Feasibility study on a hybrid mount system with air springs and piezo-stack actuators for microvibration control

Dong-Doo Jang, Hyung-Jo Jung, Yun-Ho Shin, Seok-Jun Moon, Yeong-Jong Moon, Jungkeun Oh

Publisher page

Abstract

This article proposes a new hybrid mount system with air springs and piezo-stack actuators that can deliver excellent performance in the microvibration control of high-tech facilities. Air springs are one of the most popular products for vibration isolation and deliver good performance in general. Piezo-stack actuators are capable of controlling micro- and nanolevel displacement with a fast response. In order to fully utilize the isolation and leveling performances of an air spring as a passive part, it is serially connected with a piezo-stack actuator serving as an active part. As a control logic for the hybrid mount, the filtered-X least-mean-square algorithm is applied. A hybrid mount system with four hybrid mounts is configured in order to confirm the performance of the hybrid mount and its performance is verified through a series of experimental tests.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control · Effects of Vibration on Health · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, KAIST, Korea

Department of Systems Dynamics, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials, Korea

Research Institute of Technology, Samsung C&T Corporation, Korea

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Amick H · Journal of the Institute of Environmental Sciences · 1997 · 5 · 35
2. Amick H · 2002
3. Dail Systems Co., Ltd. (2011) Available at: http://www.daeilsys.com
4. Fowler LP (1996) Application of filtered-X LMS algorithm for disturbance rejection in time-periodic systems. MS Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, VA.
5. Gordon CG · 1991 · 71
6. Lee HD · 2009 · 357
7. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/4/02710.1088/0964-1726/15/4/027 ↗
8. 10.1243/09544062JMES126910.1243/09544062JMES1269 ↗
9. 10.1121/1.142039010.1121/1.1420390 ↗
10. Persson P · 2001
11. Piezomechanik GmbH (2011) Available at: http://www.piezomechanik.com
12. 10.1115/1.400150910.1115/1.4001509 ↗
13. Takahashi Y · 1989
14. 10.1109/CDC.1996.57266110.1109/CDC.1996.572661 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0967-0661(97)00058-010.1016/S0967-0661(97)00058-0 ↗
16. Widrow B · 1985
17. 10.1109/CDC.1996.57266210.1109/CDC.1996.572662 ↗
18. 10.1117/12.35077410.1117/12.350774 ↗
19. 10.1115/1.135056610.1115/1.1350566 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0094-114X(00)00023-910.1016/S0094-114X(00)00023-9 ↗