journal article·2015-11

On the use of the electromechanical impedance technique for the assessment of dental implant stability: Modeling and experimentation

Emma La Malfa Ribolla, Piervincenzo Rizzo, Vincenzo Gulizzi

Publisher page

Abstract

We propose the electromechanical impedance technique to monitor the stability of dental implants. The technique consists of bonding one wafer-type piezoelectric transducers to the implant system. When subjected to an electric field, the transducer induces structural excitations which, in turn, affect the transducer’s electrical admittance. The hypothesis is that the health of the bone surrounding the implant affects the sensor’s admittance. A three-dimensional finite element model of a transducer bonded to the abutment of a dental implant placed in a host bone site was created to simulate the progress of the tissue healing that occurs after surgery. The healing was modeled by changing the Young’s modulus of the bone–implant interface. It was found that as the Young’s modulus of the interface increases, the electromechanical characteristic of the transducer changes. Then, the model was used to interpret the experimental results relative to a sensor bonded to an abutment screwed to implants secured into bovine bone samples. The results show that the electromechanical impedance technique can be used to monitor the stability of dental implants although more research is warranted to examine the repeatability of the methodology and its advantage with respect to existing commercial systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil, Environmental, Aerospace, Materials Engineering, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

Department of Civil Environmental Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-410.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4 ↗
2. 10.1177/1045389X0935281610.1177/1045389X09352816 ↗
3. Atsumi M · International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants · 2006 · 22 · 743
4. 10.1109/TIM.2009.201869310.1109/TIM.2009.2018693 ↗
5. 10.1038/sj.dmfr.460035410.1038/sj.dmfr.4600354 ↗
6. 10.1097/01.sap.0000189620.45708.5f10.1097/01.sap.0000189620.45708.5f ↗
7. 10.1007/978-3-642-24463-6_1610.1007/978-3-642-24463-6_16 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11012-013-9740-910.1007/s11012-013-9740-9 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01306.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01306.x ↗
10. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/4/04500810.1088/0964-1726/20/4/045008 ↗
11. Brånemark PI · 1985 · 11
12. 10.3109/0284431690903669910.3109/02844316909036699 ↗
13. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01826.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01826.x ↗
14. Cochran S (2011) Comparison of the damping characteristics of structural Al and Ti Alloys for wheelchair frame applications. Tech. Rep., Colorado School of Mines
15. 10.1902/jop.2007.06028010.1902/jop.2007.060280 ↗
16. 10.1080/0894193049050283510.1080/08941930490502835 ↗
17. Gulizzi V · Structural Durability and Health Monitoring
18. Hayashi M · Clinical Oral Implants Research · 2010 · 21 · 93110.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01934.x ↗
19. 10.1121/1.305656410.1121/1.3056564 ↗
20. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130108.x10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130108.x ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.01310.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.013 ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01022.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01022.x ↗
23. Liu W · 2007 · 65293R
24. Meredith N · International Journal of Prosthodontics · 1997 · 11 · 491
25. Moharana S · Current Science · 2012 · 103 · 685
26. Olivé J · International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants · 1990 · 5 · 390
27. Overly TG · 2007
28. 10.1177/0583102403035600110.1177/05831024030356001 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11340-006-8734-010.1007/s11340-006-8734-0 ↗
30. 10.1080/0934984070127993710.1080/09349840701279937 ↗
31. 10.1177/1045389X0707740010.1177/1045389X07077400 ↗
32. Overly TG · 2007
33. 10.1186/1749-799X-4-1010.1186/1749-799X-4-10 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.03510.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.035 ↗
35. 10.1177/1045389X0403991410.1177/1045389X04039914 ↗
36. 10.1177/147592171350676710.1177/1475921713506767 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.06.05810.1016/j.jsv.2007.06.058 ↗
38. Romanos GE · Journal of the California Dental Association · 2004 · 32 · 99110.1080/19424396.2004.12224051 ↗
39. Schulte W · Zahnarztliche Mitteilungen · 1983 · 73 · 1229
40. 10.1007/978-3-642-24463-610.1007/978-3-642-24463-6 ↗
41. Sullivan DY · International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants · 1996 · 11 · 179
42. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/11/11502210.1088/0964-1726/21/11/115022 ↗
43. Teerlinck J · International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants · 1991 · 6 · 55
44. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/5/00610.1088/0964-1726/13/5/006 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.07.01510.1016/j.medengphy.2010.07.015 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.02510.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.025 ↗
47. Yang Y · Smart Materials and Structures · 2008 · 17 · 1
48. 10.1177/10453890132056035510.1177/104538901320560355 ↗
49. 10.3390/s11070728510.3390/s110707285 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.02310.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.023 ↗
51. 10.1177/147592171243856910.1177/1475921712438569 ↗