Support Vector Machine based Online Composite Helicopter Rotor Blade Damage Detection System
Source abstract
Abstract
This work explores a feasibility of using vibratory hub loads and support vector machine (SVM) to predict damage and hence the life consumption of the composite helicopter rotor blade. Generally, the initial part of the composite's life is dominated by matrix cracking; the intermediate part by debonding/delamination and the final failure due to fiber breakage. The simulated hub loads under various damage levels are obtained using a comprehensive aeroelastic analysis of the composite rotor blade with physics based damage modes and are then linked with the life consumption of the blade using a phenomenological model. The SVM is used for classification of the useful life of the blade into three classes which are useful to decide the prognostic action. The performance of the blade damage detection system is demonstrated using simulated hub loads obtained using a two-cell airfoil section representing the stiff-inplane blade. The model based hub load variations are contaminated with noise to simulate the real data. It is observed that the SVM based damage detection system is more robust, reliable and easy to implement than the rotating frame measurement based methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aerospace Information Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea
Department of Aerospace Information Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea,
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0020-7683(96)00156-410.1016/S0020-7683(96)00156-4 ↗
2. 10.2514/2.500910.2514/2.5009 ↗
3. Azzam, H. · '' Journal of Aerospace Engineering · 1997 · 211 · 29
4. Azzam, H.
5. Bir, G. and Chopra, I. 1994. ``University of Maryland Advanced Rotorcraft Code,'' UM-AERO Report 94-18.
6. Boser, B.E.
7. 10.1098/rsta.2000.071410.1098/rsta.2000.0714 ↗
8. 10.1021/ci034116110.1021/ci0341161 ↗
9. 10.1006/jsvi.1997.123310.1006/jsvi.1997.1233 ↗
10. 10.1080/0020772005019776710.1080/00207720050197767 ↗
11. 10.1016/0961-9526(92)90032-210.1016/0961-9526(92)90032-2 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0099401810.1007/BF00994018 ↗
13. 10.1106/10453890202259810.1106/104538902022598 ↗
14. 10.2514/2.158810.2514/2.1588 ↗
15. 10.2514/3.1314710.2514/3.13147 ↗
16. 10.4050/JAHS.41.30210.4050/JAHS.41.302 ↗
17. 10.4050/JAHS.42.16110.4050/JAHS.42.161 ↗
18. 10.2514/2.234210.2514/2.2342 ↗
19. 10.1106/9V39-ETJU-DNMG-TJUF10.1106/9V39-ETJU-DNMG-TJUF ↗
20. Giurgiutiu, V.
21. 10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00190-110.1016/S0022-460X(03)00190-1 ↗
22. Jack, L.B.
23. Jones, R.M. · 1999
24. 10.2514/2.57110.2514/2.571 ↗
25. 10.1177/1045389X980090020810.1177/1045389X9800900208 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00126-510.1016/S0263-8223(02)00126-5 ↗
27. Oster, R.
28. 10.1016/S0045-7825(03)00237-810.1016/S0045-7825(03)00237-8 ↗
29. 10.1177/1045389X0505100110.1177/1045389X05051001 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.021 ↗
31. 10.4050/1.309287210.4050/1.3092872 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.03310.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.033 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.11.04310.1016/j.compstruct.2005.11.043 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.09.00610.1016/j.ymssp.2006.09.006 ↗
35. 10.2514/1.2649510.2514/1.26495 ↗
36. Purekar, A.
37. 10.1088/0964-1726/12/2/31110.1088/0964-1726/12/2/311 ↗
38. Schoess, J.
39. 10.1177/00219983950290070510.1177/002199839502900705 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.03010.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.030 ↗
41. 10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-010.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.12.00710.1016/j.ymssp.2006.12.007 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.00610.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.006 ↗